By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A new lawsuit filed against the Archdiocese of New Orleans accuses Archbishop Gregory Aymond and Vicar General Pat Williams of covering up child sexual abuse. Argent Institutional Trust Co., the bond trustee representing investors, alleges the officials concealed the extent of the abuse before investors purchased $41 million in church bond debt. The lawsuit cites reporting by news outlets highlighting the omission of abusers from the Archbishop’s official list and secret files regarding abuse. The suit seeks to deny Aymond and Williams retirement benefits and prioritize payments to bondholders.
Read the original article here
New Orleans archbishop accused of personally hiding child abuse in a lawsuit is a sadly familiar headline, isn’t it? It’s disheartening to see this pattern repeat itself, and this time, it’s not just about accusations, but a direct allegation that the Archbishop of New Orleans, Gregory Aymond, actively participated in covering up child sexual abuse committed by priests and deacons. This isn’t just a vague claim; the lawsuit, filed by Argent Institutional Trust Co., which represents investors who purchased church bonds, asserts that Aymond himself was involved in concealing these heinous acts. The lawsuit is even seeking to block his future retirement benefits as a form of punishment, which speaks to the severity of the accusations.
The allegations, as the lawsuit contends, highlight a deeper problem, an alleged systemic cover-up within the church. The lawsuit indicates it wasn’t a matter of a few bad apples but of a culture where protecting the institution took precedence over protecting vulnerable children. The church’s response, predictably, is that the allegations are baseless and rely on third-hand reports, a common defense. However, it is difficult to ignore how the scale of the problem means it very likely had high-level officials directly involved. The fact that this lawsuit comes from investors, rather than abuse survivors, is significant, as it indicates a potential financial motive for the church’s alleged actions.
It’s difficult to comprehend how the leadership could potentially act in ways that would make them complicit in the cover-up and even the acts themselves. Furthermore, the suggestion that bankruptcy is a tactic to avoid paying settlements adds another layer of moral bankruptcy to this unfolding situation. It understandably raises questions of whether the Catholic Church should be treated as any other criminal organization, with all that entails. And it’s easy to see why people might feel betrayed by the church and its leaders. It speaks to why the church is constantly under scrutiny for its actions, and why so many people feel that organized religion often fails those it is meant to protect.
There is also a great deal of frustration for many people who feel a connection to the church, be it cultural, social, or spiritual. Many people don’t want to cast aside their beliefs but are frustrated by the very real actions of people who supposedly represent that belief system. This case really cuts deep for those who, despite their personal connection to the church, have had their trust shattered. It’s a painful situation for anyone who has a good heart and wants to do good in the world.
Many see that this problem is not limited to one leader or one level of leadership. It’s easy to believe that the cover-up and failures to prevent or address individual cases originated from different levels of the church, from the Vatican to local parishes. The motivation behind these alleged actions is the prioritization of protecting the institution over protecting children. The Church’s justification, according to those commenting, is that the Church is so vital to God’s plan that hiding crimes is preferable to allowing scandal to damage its reputation.
The Catholic Church has been accused of acting as “too big to fail.” And it’s easy to see how the scandal has damaged the church’s reputation far more than acknowledging the crimes and cooperating with law enforcement would have done. The arrogance, or “pride,” of the individuals involved, believing they are so important to God’s plan that they are above the law, is perhaps the most offensive aspect. This is a sad reality.