Authorities in Argentina are investigating the disappearance of a painting looted by the Nazis after it was identified in an estate agent’s advertisement. The artwork, “Portrait of a Lady” by Giuseppe Ghislandi, was last seen hanging in a property near Buenos Aires being sold by the daughter of a former Nazi. A police raid on the residence failed to locate the painting, though they did seize two weapons, leading to suspicion of a smuggling cover-up. The painting, once part of a collection forced to be sold by the Nazis, had been missing for over 80 years before its recent reappearance.
Read the original article here
Painting looted by Nazis has vanished again, say Argentine police, and it’s a situation that, frankly, feels both absurd and infuriating. The story, as it unfolds, is a head-scratcher, a frustrating game of hide-and-seek with a piece of art that shouldn’t be in the hands of those who currently control it.
It seems the Italian painter Giuseppe Ghislandi’s work, once glimpsed in a real estate ad for a swanky Argentine property, has once again disappeared into the ether. The immediate reaction, based on the way things seem to play out, suggests the likely culprit is the descendant of a Nazi, the supposed current owner of the painting. It’s either a lightning-fast cover-up or, perhaps, a daring heist by someone who saw the ad and made a grab for the artwork. The fact that the “Lady” in the portrait looks, shall we say, altered, adds to the intrigue, and definitely doesn’t help.
Adding fuel to the fire, a floral still-life by the 17th-century Dutch painter Abraham Mignon, another piece of looted art, was spotted on social media by the same family. This further confirms the idea that this isn’t just about one painting; it’s about a collection of stolen treasures, and the people who are hoarding them.
The broader picture here is troubling. There’s a lot of Nazi-looted artwork still out there, hidden away by the descendants of those who originally stole it. It makes you wonder how much more is hidden, and how many more descendants are sitting on priceless, and stolen, treasures.
It’s not difficult to see a clear course of action here: the right thing to do is to simply admit the obvious, hand over the painting, and wash your hands of this whole mess. Sadly, it’s clear that the individuals involved are not willing to do the right thing. Maintaining possession is like wearing a neon sign that says, “I’m hiding something stolen”.
The pressure has to be relentless. The story has to be kept alive, and there can be no letting up until they surrender. The art doesn’t belong to them, plain and simple, and they know that very well.
There is a certain irony in this, isn’t there? The authorities publish the story, and the painting promptly vanishes. It seems like a classic case of jumping the gun, giving the “owners” a heads-up and ample time to make it disappear. It’s a testament to how well-connected and protected these people apparently are.
The implications are, quite frankly, unsettling. The persistence of these groups and individuals, their continued possession of stolen art, suggests a network that’s deeply ingrained and perhaps still active. It’s a reminder of the historical fact that many Nazis fled to South America after WWII, and it seems like some of the same people may still be at it, many years later.
And the idea that this stolen art is potentially being reclaimed by its owners raises some interesting, though not necessarily moral, questions. But these actions and the actions of the thieves are immoral.
The art world, unfortunately, can be a target for such activities, but that’s not the case here. It’s also hard to ignore the speculation about the involvement of powerful figures and institutions. Whispers of the Oval Office, the White House, even Tesla HQ are, perhaps, fueled by cynicism, but they’re also indicative of the widespread distrust and the feeling that those in positions of power are not above reproach.
Ultimately, this is a story about stolen art, yes, but it’s also about greed, cover-ups, and the long, shadowy reach of history. It’s about the audacity of those who believe they can simply hide what’s not theirs, and the determination of those who are still fighting for justice, even when it seems like the odds are stacked against them.
