By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A portrait by Giuseppe Ghislandi, looted by the Nazis from a Jewish art dealer in Amsterdam, has been identified on the website of an estate agent advertising a house in Argentina. The painting, *Portrait of a Lady*, belonged to Jacques Goudstikker, whose collection was seized by Hermann Göring during World War II. Wartime documents suggest the painting was in the possession of a Nazi official who later fled to Argentina, where his daughters now reside. The Goudstikker estate’s heirs plan to make every effort to recover the painting, and the search for the looted artworks continues.
Read the original article here
Old master painting looted by Nazis spotted in Argentinian property listing, and it instantly sparks a wave of historical echoes. This revelation feels like a moment frozen in time, a stark reminder of the atrocities of World War II and the enduring legacy of those dark years. It’s a story that immediately raises questions, starting with the simple, yet profound: How in the world did it end up there?
The painting, a “Portrait of a Lady,” once belonged to Jacques Goudstikker, a prominent Dutch art dealer. He was forced to flee the Netherlands in May 1940 to escape the invading Nazis. Tragically, he died in the process, falling from a ship, and his art collection, including this valuable old master, was swiftly and suspiciously acquired by none other than Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring, a key figure in the Nazi regime. The speed and circumstances surrounding this forced sale are hard to ignore, raising suspicions of calculated exploitation amidst the chaos of war.
The fact that this painting has resurfaced in Argentina, a country that became a haven for many fleeing Nazis after the war, is hardly a surprise. Many high-ranking Nazi officials found refuge there, escaping the consequences of their actions, and, as history suggests, brought their ill-gotten gains with them. Knowing that Argentina was a favored destination, it’s easy to imagine Nazi artifacts and assets finding their way into the country, often concealed or hidden.
The involvement of the daughters of a senior Nazi official in the current situation adds another layer of complexity and intrigue. Their connection to the painting, and the potential knowledge they possess, immediately places them in the spotlight. The thought of unrepentant descendants of war criminals still clinging to stolen assets is appalling. This alone warrants serious scrutiny, and it will be interesting to see what unfolds next.
The discovery of this painting could lead to the unearthing of more evidence of Nazi plunder. It is possible the painting could be a clue to a treasure trove of other stolen artifacts hidden within the Argentinian property. The mention of a large rug covering something else that once hung on the wall, possibly another valuable piece of art, is a tantalizing detail. It underscores the likelihood that the daughters know more than they let on.
The legal and ethical implications of this discovery are complex, yet seemingly straightforward. The original owner, or their heirs, still retain legal claim to the painting, regardless of how many hands it’s passed through. Possession of stolen goods, especially when coupled with an attempt to conceal them, can lead to criminal charges, although local laws in Argentina will need to be considered. It is crucial to question those in the current line of ownership.
One can almost see the scene unfolding: authorities questioning those connected to the property, perhaps even the daughters themselves. A warrant to search the premises, and maybe even audit the estate, is a reasonable request, and it seems logical that they’d be very interested in their acquaintances. This is a clear case of stolen art, stolen property, and the legal process should follow.
The story also brings to mind the larger historical context. Argentina was not alone in offering refuge to fleeing Nazis. Other South American countries, and even places like the United States, were involved. The fact that many of those who fled have descendants is another interesting facet. The reality of Nazis escaping justice, and their potential involvement in the continued existence of stolen artifacts, is an uncomfortable truth.
The discovery underscores the enduring impact of the Holocaust and the persistent need to confront its legacy. It is a reminder that the wounds of the past can be very much alive. It’s a case that likely will go to court. It could very well open a Pandora’s Box. Hopefully, the rightful owners will get their painting back. It’s time for the questioning to begin.