By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In response to a declared “crime emergency” by Donald Trump, the National Guard was deployed in Washington, D.C., and observed picking up trash in parks. Despite Trump’s claims of lawlessness, crime rates were at a 30-year low earlier this year. This initiative is part of a larger plan involving 40 or more tasks and has led to over 1,000 arrests, including suspected illegal immigrants. Reactions to the crackdown vary, with some residents expressing mixed feelings and concerns about immigration raids, while a magistrate judge criticized the government’s handling as reckless.
Read the original article here
National Guard called in to deal with ‘crime emergency’ in DC are now picking up trash outside the White House, and it’s hard not to be taken aback by the situation. You have to wonder, what exactly did these service members think they were signing up for? Did they envision themselves patrolling the streets, maybe assisting local law enforcement, perhaps engaging in some type of emergency response? Instead, it seems, their primary task has become picking up litter, particularly around the White House. It’s a stark contrast between expectations and reality, and it’s easy to see why some might find it both disheartening and even a little insulting.
Has anyone stopped to ask the National Guard troops how they feel about this turn of events? Are they getting paid enough to justify the task? There’s a sense that this is all part of a bigger picture – a way of normalizing the presence of the military in urban spaces. The cost is also staggering. At a reported million dollars per day, this isn’t just a temporary solution; it’s an incredibly expensive one. It makes you wonder if a regular city cleanup crew would have been a more practical and cost-effective approach, especially with the city’s lower crime rate compared to cities like London.
You can almost hear the skepticism, right? “Oh, they’re ‘policing’ the area,” some might sarcastically remark. This whole situation feels like a strange mix of theater and wastefulness. What happened to their usual jobs? Their families? It’s a part-time commitment, yes, but it’s still a significant disruption to their lives. And let’s be honest, the optics are terrible. “Weekend warriors” indeed. Imagine the future recruiting videos, complete with dramatic music and shots of soldiers picking up discarded fast food containers. The underlying goal, it seems, isn’t necessarily about fighting crime; it’s about establishing a military presence.
The question of what crime are we actually discussing is a fair one to ask. The crime is just litter, so the mission itself, may not have the intended effect. The irony isn’t lost on many. This kind of assignment seems like the kind of situation that could foster resentment amongst the troops. It’s a demeaning role, taking them away from their lives and families for something that feels less like a service to the country and more like a political maneuver.
It also brings up a deeper set of concerns. Where are the elected officials? Why is this the solution? And, most importantly, is this truly the best use of the National Guard’s resources and training? You have to imagine the boredom involved. One can only take so many selfies. There are other groups that are not normal and may be more alarming than a few soldiers picking up trash. The whole situation screams of political posturing and a gross misuse of taxpayer dollars.
The contrast is stark: a supposed crime emergency, and the solution is literally cleaning up the mess. It makes you wonder what the true intentions are. Is it about crime, or is it about something else entirely? The entire episode feels symbolic of a larger problem: a lack of respect for the military and the values they represent. It’s a frustrating situation that deserves a closer look.