By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The use of National Guard troops for expanded immigration roundups and policing actions, driven by President Trump, is incurring significant costs. These deployments are drawing from funds intended for crucial training and operational readiness. State National Guard units are seeking additional funding to cover expenses, facing potential financial liabilities that could hinder their ability to respond to emergencies. Concerns are also raised about the timely compensation of National Guard members, with potential financial hardships for those deployed.
Read the original article here
The National Guard may run out of money because of Trump’s repeated deployments, which could cripple the force. It’s almost like a slow-motion train wreck, with the financial repercussions of these deployments steadily mounting. The worry is that the consistent draw on resources, combined with what appears to be a lack of foresight regarding the financial burden, could lead to a situation where the Guard is unable to fulfill its core missions.
Considering the current circumstances, it’s quite probable that the National Guard’s funding will be depleted. Some are looking ahead and wondering about the potential for a “bond market crash,” which may arise in the near future. There is also a question of where all the funds are going to come from to pay for the unexpected deployments. With large sums of money being allocated to other departments, the resources available for the National Guard are shrinking. The concern is further amplified when the sheer magnitude of national debt is considered.
These deployments are not just a financial drain; they also have a human cost. Guardsmen and women have civilian jobs, and repeated activations can lead to missed work, potential job losses, and disruptions to their lives. This is an issue of fairness, particularly as some Guardsmen and women may seek ways to qualify for a Title 2 pension, which creates a further, unanticipated financial burden. The deployments that seem to be constant and never-ending place a significant amount of stress on the members, their families, and their employers.
In essence, it appears that some suspect that these deployments are not just a matter of national security, but a deliberate move to weaken the National Guard. Some feel that the lack of funding, the drain on personnel, and the focus on tasks that are outside of the Guard’s primary role are a recipe for disaster. It could be said that an organization meant to protect the country is being used in a way that could render it ineffective in a true emergency. There is speculation that this could lead to a reliance on other agencies or even a private military.
Adding to the challenges, there are logistical and administrative headaches. States are struggling to be reimbursed for the costs of previous deployments, such as the deployment of troops to Washington D.C. This puts a strain on state budgets, and it creates a level of uncertainty that makes it difficult to plan and budget for future missions. The longer this situation drags on, the more likely it is that the National Guard will become stretched too thin, both financially and operationally. The whole scenario is reminiscent of how a business goes bankrupt.
From an operational standpoint, there are concerns about readiness. If the National Guard is constantly tied up in missions that aren’t directly related to its primary functions, then its ability to respond to natural disasters, domestic emergencies, or even national security threats could be compromised. There is a real fear that the Guard will be unable to fulfill its role in the event of a major crisis. This would create a ripple effect where all departments, including the federal government, have a difficult time maintaining functionality.
It’s disheartening to realize how easily funding can be mismanaged when the focus is elsewhere. This sort of prioritization has dire effects, such as the cutting of funds meant for critical services like FEMA, while other agencies are seemingly lavished with funds. There is a sense of frustration that resources are not being allocated effectively and that the priorities are out of sync with the needs of the country.
The larger picture suggests that this is not just about money, but about the integrity and effectiveness of a vital national resource. The National Guard’s financial woes are a symptom of a deeper issue: a lack of foresight and a disregard for the long-term consequences of policy decisions. The hope is that those in power will see the importance of addressing these issues before it is too late, and that the National Guard will receive the support and resources it needs to fulfill its critical role.