By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the conviction of Erin Patterson for the murder of three relatives using a toxic mushroom-laced meal, previously suppressed allegations of attempted murder against her estranged husband have been made public. Simon Patterson testified in pre-trial hearings, detailing a pattern of suspected poisoning attempts spanning several years, starting with pasta and curry. He recounted several instances where he became severely ill after consuming food prepared by Patterson, including episodes that resulted in hospitalizations and coma. Though the charges related to Simon Patterson were dropped before the trial, the released information reveals a history of suspected poisoning attempts.
Read the original article here
Mushroom murderer tried to kill husband with pasta, cookies and curry, court was told. This is the kind of headline that immediately grabs your attention, and once you start digging into the details, it’s a story that’s as shocking as it is bizarre. The image of someone methodically trying to poison their family, not just once but repeatedly, using a variety of seemingly harmless dishes, is genuinely unsettling. It’s hard to wrap your head around the level of planning and the sheer audacity of it all. A beef wellington? That’s not a quick weeknight meal; it’s a labor of love, or in this case, a labor of lethal intent.
The pre-trial hearings shed light on the growing concerns within the family. The husband’s sister, Anna Terrington, expressed her belief that her brother was being poisoned, and her apprehension about a planned lunch was understandable. The fact that she warned her parents beforehand and that they dismissed her concerns, saying “No, we’ll be ok,” is just astonishing in retrospect. It underscores how difficult it can be to believe that someone you know, someone you interact with regularly, is capable of such a calculated act of violence.
One of the most perplexing aspects of this case, and a question many found themselves grappling with, is why the husband kept eating her food after becoming sick multiple times. Falling into a coma and having part of your colon removed is not a minor ailment; it’s a clear indication of a serious problem. Yet, he continued to eat meals she prepared. The answers, of course, are complicated and involve denial, trust, and perhaps a degree of manipulation. It appears that it took time to form a pattern that could not be explained away as merely regular food poisoning.
Digging deeper into the motivations behind the attempted murders reveals a complex family dynamic and the roots of their demise. The couple’s relationship deteriorated after the husband filed a tax return that listed himself as single. This change in his status affected the perpetrator’s ability to receive child support. This fueled tension, and resentment. While a financial dispute is a common issue, it doesn’t usually result in the multiple attempts at murder. Yet, this situation certainly did, and the lengths she went to, including the beef Wellington, are mind boggling.
The level of sophistication in the planning is also striking. It wasn’t just a one-off incident. It involved a series of carefully orchestrated attempts, with various dishes used to deliver the poison. The meticulous nature of these preparations is something that is hard to fathom. It’s a reminder that evil can sometimes wear a very ordinary disguise. It seems that she was trying to create a pattern that would suggest something beyond the norm.
The family dynamics appear to have been critical in this case. They were a religious family and seemed to trust in the good in people. This may have caused them to give the accused many chances. The husband’s parents, too, struggled to accept the possibility that their daughter-in-law was responsible. This refusal to believe the worst, especially when it involved a close family member, is understandable. It is, as some said, far easier to believe that your son is just unlucky than that your daughter-in-law is a would-be murderer.
The court was told that the husband didn’t suspect his wife was poisoning him after the first incident of falling ill. Ordinary food poisoning is a relatively common occurrence. Only after a pattern emerged, and the doctors couldn’t explain the sickness, did he start to consider the possibility of poisoning. The situation may have been worsened by the husband’s situation. The accused might have used manipulation or control to sow doubt, and the husband would then distrust his own instincts.
This case highlights the complexity of human relationships and the insidious nature of manipulation. It underscores how a combination of factors, including financial disputes, strained family dynamics, and a willingness to deceive, can lead to devastating consequences. The story, as it unfolded in court, painted a picture of methodical planning and a callous disregard for human life.