By John Q. Hosedrinker 
HarperCollins is removing claims about Melania Trump and her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein from future editions of Andrew Lownie’s book, “Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York.” The decision was made to mitigate potential legal risks, following Melania’s threat to sue Hunter Biden over similar allegations. This action comes after the book had already been published in around 60,000 copies. The book also contains claims about Prince Andrew’s relationship with Epstein.
Read the original article here
So, the story here is that claims about Melania Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein are being scrubbed from a new book about Prince Andrew. It’s a bit of a tangled web, and it certainly raises some eyebrows, doesn’t it? This whole situation screams of damage control and a desperate attempt to rewrite history, or at least, control the narrative.
It seems the publisher, HarperCollins, a company owned by Rupert Murdoch, is the one making the decision to remove these claims. The official reason, at least according to them, is to avoid the potential of a costly legal battle. It’s a business decision, plain and simple, driven by the desire to minimize financial risk. Of course, some might see this as a cozy relationship between powerful figures, maybe even a tacit agreement to protect each other.
The timing of this removal is interesting. It comes on the heels of Melania Trump threatening to sue Hunter Biden over claims that Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump. It also follows Donald Trump’s own threat to sue Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal. This all suggests a climate of heightened sensitivity around the issue. The fact that Trump is trying to sanitize his wife’s history is very suspicious.
The specific claims being removed from the book are, naturally, not detailed. The book, “Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York” by Andrew Lownie, included claims made by Epstein. We can only speculate about what was written, but the fact that it was deemed too risky to include speaks volumes. One thing that’s clear is that Epstein’s version of events would have been quite damaging, especially if true.
The situation isn’t just about Melania; the focus is really on the larger implications for those involved. Prince Andrew’s connection to Epstein is well-documented, and this book was already set to explore that history. But the inclusion of Melania adds another layer of complexity, especially given the accusations of criminal activity.
This whole thing smells of attempts to cover up. A lot of people are saying the same thing: the censorship is the real story here. The original hard copies still contain the removed material. So, the ebook and audiobook are scrubbed. The internet, however, seems to be remembering everything.
One interesting point of discussion is why Prince Andrew even has a book. In this case, though, the details are being used for purposes of manipulation. Of course, the legal maneuvering is a constant thing.
Ultimately, the removal of these claims is bound to stoke more speculation than it quells. It confirms the notion that there’s something worth hiding, and that those in positions of power will go to great lengths to protect themselves, even if it means erasing information and rewriting history. It’s the Streisand effect in action. The attempt to suppress information only makes people more curious, and drives them to seek out what’s been concealed.