By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Library of Congress’s online copy of the U.S. Constitution was briefly modified to remove the section guaranteeing the right to challenge detention, coinciding with the Trump administration’s consideration of suspending habeas corpus. Government officials attributed the deletion to a technical “glitch,” prompting internal review and correction. The timing of the error raised suspicion, given the administration’s efforts to undermine constitutional rights and Trump’s ongoing attempt to control the Library of Congress. The deleted sections have since been restored, and the Library of Congress has stated it was due to a “coding error”.
Read the original article here
Trump’s Least Favorite Part of Constitution Deleted From Govt. Website is a situation that, frankly, feels unsettling. It seems the official Library of Congress website, the go-to source for the US Constitution, experienced a rather peculiar glitch. Sections 8, 9, and 10 of Article 1, which cover crucial topics like the powers of Congress and, critically, the right to habeas corpus, vanished. This disappearance, especially of the provision guaranteeing the right to challenge detention, raises some eyebrows, to say the least.
The timing of this “coding error,” as the Library of Congress later called it, is what really fuels suspicion. It coincided with the second Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to, shall we say, reinterpret the Constitution to their liking. Specifically, there’s been talk of suspending habeas corpus, with some officials openly considering it as a tool to detain and deport immigrants. The fact that the sections removed dealt directly with this very right is hard to ignore.
The responses to the event are interesting. Initially, the official explanation leaned towards a technical glitch. However, the coincidence is hard to ignore. Many people believe that it’s not so simple. The timing of the deletions, coinciding with the administration’s open skepticism about these constitutional protections, raises suspicions. It feels more like a deliberate action.
The whole situation highlights the importance of the Constitution as a bedrock of American rights. Removing it from a website doesn’t change the law itself, of course, but it’s a clear signal. It seems like a manipulation tactic to make certain information harder to find, especially for those unfamiliar with the legal system. This act could create an environment where these people can act against their own best interests.
Of course, there are a range of responses to this, from the skeptical “glitch” explanation to the more cynical belief that this is a deliberate attempt to undermine constitutional rights. One observation that’s particularly pertinent is the suggestion that this could be a distraction. With so much going on, it’s not unreasonable to think that this sort of event could be used to deflect from other controversies.
Ultimately, the incident raises serious questions about the current administration’s respect for the Constitution. It makes one question whether they really understand the laws of their own country, or perhaps it is a complete lack of caring. It’s difficult to shake the feeling that the core values of the country are being eroded by such actions.