By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a rare display of emotion, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un paid tribute to soldiers killed fighting for Russia in Ukraine, acknowledging the military losses. At a ceremony in Pyongyang, he met with commanders and bereaved families, pinning commendation badges on both the returning soldiers and photo frames of the deceased. This acknowledgment comes as roughly 12,000 North Korean troops are currently in Russia, with reports indicating that Kim plans to triple that number, despite significant casualties and the use of brutal tactics by North Korean forces. The increased cooperation between the two countries raises concerns about the exchange of advanced technology, particularly in space and nuclear weapons programs.
Read the original article here
Kim Jong Un says his ‘heart aches’ over North Korean soldiers killed fighting for Russia, in a rare admission of losses. Well, that’s a sentence, isn’t it? You’ve got Kim Jong Un, the leader of North Korea, known for his, shall we say, *unique* approach to international relations, admitting his “heart aches” over the loss of his soldiers. And not just any soldiers, mind you, but those fighting *for* Russia. This is, to put it mildly, unusual. It’s not every day you hear this level of acknowledgement from a regime that typically operates under a thick veil of secrecy and propaganda.
The sheer rarity of the admission is what jumps out first. North Korea isn’t exactly known for its transparency, especially when it comes to military matters. They’ve got a reputation for tightly controlling information and projecting an image of strength and invincibility. Acknowledging casualties, especially in a foreign conflict, just doesn’t fit that narrative. So, the fact that Kim Jong Un is saying his “heart aches” is a pretty big deal. It hints at something going on behind the curtain, a shift in the typical propaganda machine.
The obvious implication here is that North Korea is deeply involved in the war in Ukraine, sending its soldiers to fight alongside Russia. This is something that’s been suspected, of course, but this public acknowledgment seems to confirm those suspicions. And let’s be clear, fighting in Ukraine isn’t a walk in the park. It’s a brutal, bloody conflict with high casualty rates. It’s not hard to imagine the conditions faced by these soldiers.
Of course, this “heartache” admission comes with a layer of complexity. Some might question the sincerity, given the leader’s actions. After all, if his heart truly ached, wouldn’t he reconsider sending more troops? It’s a delicate balance of public perception, trying to show compassion and concern while simultaneously continuing the very actions that caused the grief in the first place. Some might even say this is a performance, a strategic move meant to appease the families of the deceased while still maintaining support for Russia. It’s difficult to say, but it does seem a bit contradictory to express sadness while potentially sending even more soldiers into harm’s way.
The comments highlight the sense of cynicism surrounding the announcement. Many people are quick to point out the apparent hypocrisy. They raise questions about Kim’s true motives, suggesting that the statement might be more about maintaining the regime’s image and solidifying its alliance with Russia than genuine concern for the fallen soldiers. The phrase “crocodile tears” is frequently mentioned, the implication being that the sentiment isn’t genuine, and is instead designed to manipulate public opinion. The sentiment seems to be that the public does not believe his “heart aches”.
Another point that’s raised is the context of the situation within North Korea itself. While the leader expresses sorrow over the deaths of soldiers fighting for Russia, the population within North Korea faces significant hardships, including poverty, starvation, and a lack of basic freedoms. This contrast between the regime’s outward display of concern and the internal realities of its citizens is a common point of criticism. Many see the situation as a stark illustration of the regime’s priorities, where external alliances take precedence over the well-being of its own people. There is a feeling that his attention could be better spent on his own country and citizens.
The comments also point to the economic aspect of the situation. North Korea is heavily sanctioned and relies on alliances like the one with Russia. Supplying soldiers to fight alongside Russian forces could be seen as a way to gain favor, access to resources, or receive economic benefits from Russia. There’s a practical reason for sending the soldiers, beyond any ideological alignment. The assumption is that the compensation from Russia is substantial, and the loss of life is something the regime is willing to accept for that gain.
The overall sentiment towards Kim Jong Un seems to be one of skepticism, and even disdain. Many express a lack of trust in his words and motives, seeing the announcement as another attempt to maintain control and further his own agenda. The reaction shows a very critical understanding of how the North Korean regime operates. The public seems to be well aware that the leadership has its own priorities, and that these priorities don’t always align with the well-being of its people.
In summary, the news that Kim Jong Un says his ‘heart aches’ over North Korean soldiers killed fighting for Russia is a significant event. It highlights the depth of North Korea’s involvement in the war, the complexities of its motivations, and the cynicism with which many people view the regime’s actions. While this may be seen as an attempt to present a façade of compassion, it may also be a miscalculation. The very admission that his “heart aches” calls attention to the cost of this ongoing conflict.