By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Japan has requested that European and Asian countries avoid participation in China’s upcoming military parade and related events commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. The Japanese government is concerned about China’s historical interpretations and the anti-Japanese sentiment perceived in the events. These commemorative events, including a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, are scheduled for September 3rd, preceded by the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit, which Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to attend. In 2015, leaders from major Western countries and then Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe did not attend a similar parade.
Read the original article here
Japan asked countries to skip China’s WWII commemorative events in September. It’s a complex situation, really, with layers of history, apology, and resentment. Looking back, Japan’s actions during World War II were undeniably brutal. The stories of mass executions, the use of live humans for biological and chemical testing, and the atrocities committed in places like Nanjing are difficult to comprehend. These events caused immense suffering, leading to the deaths of millions and leaving scars that continue to affect the region.
This context makes Japan’s request to other nations to avoid China’s commemorative events in September a bit of a head-scratcher. It feels like trying to sweep the past under the rug. Many feel Japan should own up to its history, acknowledge the wrongdoings, and fully commit to genuine reconciliation. The path to a stronger, more respected nation lies in confronting the truth of the past, not avoiding it. The scale of the atrocities, especially the estimated millions of Chinese deaths, demands acknowledgement. This is a difficult ask, especially given the actions of the Axis powers during the war.
The reactions to this situation are varied, and it’s easy to see why. Some wonder if Japan is truly aware of how deeply its actions were felt. There’s a sentiment that if Japan was making this request based on concerns about the CCP’s involvement, perhaps it would be more successful. Yet, the reality is, that countries like South Korea and those in Southeast Asia will likely not heed this call. Remembering the events of the war are essential and can be incredibly difficult for people in those countries and those that had a part in it. The weight of the past cannot be ignored.
Imagine the scenario: if Germany asked the world to ignore the Holocaust, the uproar would be immense. This historical perspective highlights the scale of what Japan is essentially requesting. The fact that this is happening means that Japan’s history is still deeply painful and not easily forgotten, at least by those who suffered and those that were in support. It is like China now has a reason to put Japan on the stand. This situation offers an annual opportunity to scrutinize Japan while giving China the benefit of the doubt. However, there is also an understanding of the CCP’s involvement and the problem of authoritarianism, which can also be despicable.
The request feels diplomatically clumsy, especially considering the historical context of China fighting for years before the rest of the world got involved in the Pacific War. Japan’s actions in WWII were, in a word, deplorable. In light of this, it’s a challenge to understand the perspective that seems to suggest that Japan’s past is something to be forgotten. There’s a feeling that if the world’s allies were to avoid China’s commemorative events, that would diminish the sacrifices made by the Chinese people.
There’s a widespread belief that Japan’s actions in WWII were absolutely horrific. There is an acknowledgement that Japan has apologized and offered compensation. However, the issue of Japan’s historical reckoning is not as straightforward. Some people believe there are influential politicians in Japan who genuinely believe that Japan was blameless. This situation is made more complex by varying historical views and the CCP’s questionable human rights record.
Moreover, the way Japan teaches its history in schools has been criticized, with some suggesting that it minimizes their wartime aggression and highlights their suffering from the atomic bombs. This is a delicate situation since the facts are not fully appreciated by all sides. There is also the idea that the country, and its people, haven’t fully acknowledged the extent of its wrongdoings. This is something that, according to some, continues to fuel tensions.
There’s also the reality that the war was long and complex, with a heavy cost on all sides. With the horrors of the war, you have to take into account the level of fanaticism of those who had a part in it. Then there’s the political play between the two countries, the historical role played by the US in the war, and the complexities and nuances that are at play. The US, for its own reasons, may have contributed to what happened in Japan.
All things considered, it feels like this request is missing the mark. True strength lies in confronting the past and acknowledging the pain caused. It’s not a time to brush the past aside. It’s a time for honest dialogue and a commitment to a future where these events are never repeated.