By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On Friday, ICE agents conducted a raid at a Studio City car wash, taking several workers into custody, which was caught on video. The operation, which occurred in front of stunned customers, prompted confrontations between agents and angry community members. ICE agents were also seen at a Home Depot in Pomona, where several more arrests were made. Senator Susan Rubio condemned the operations, calling them devastating for families and communities.
Read the original article here
ICE agents targeting a well-known Studio City car wash, taking several workers into custody, immediately sparks a cascade of questions and, frankly, a lot of anger. It’s hard to ignore the feeling that this isn’t about upholding the law as much as it is about picking on vulnerable people. The comments paint a picture of hardworking individuals, some potentially on the path to citizenship, being targeted while actual criminals seem to get a pass. The focus shifts from whether this is a legal operation to whether it’s even a moral one.
The very act of showing up at a workplace to detain people raises immediate suspicions. Are warrants even involved? Are these legitimate agents, or is someone cosplaying as law enforcement? These concerns echo throughout the comments, with several people pointing out how the agents are dressed and what kind of vehicles they are using. The fear is palpable: of a “gestapo” force, of kidnapping, of an administration that seems to be more interested in political theater than public safety.
The timing and location of the raid are also highly criticized. Why Studio City? Why target a car wash? This is not about stopping organized crime. It’s about punishing hard-working individuals, many of whom are the backbone of our service economy. And the question that keeps bubbling to the surface is, why not go after the business owners who might be exploiting these workers? Why aren’t they being held accountable for their part?
A significant amount of time is spent discussing the potential impact on American jobs. Ironically, this argument isn’t always the one that the ICE agents, who, according to some, just wanted to “get those jobs back” are looking to advance. There’s a strong undercurrent of doubt that the people who are suddenly supposed to fill these jobs will actually *want* them, especially given the wages often associated with these types of work. It’s mentioned how that car wash had to be closed the next day after the raid. The job will be taken over by no one, or it will go up in price, and business owners will have to hire people on the books with minimum wage, which is a good thing.
It is important to note that this conversation isn’t just about individual experiences, it also touches on a larger issue of priorities within law enforcement. Why not target the gang members or the people committing actual crimes? Many comments highlight a sense of hypocrisy. It’s much easier to target people who are just trying to make a living, right?
The discussion then morphs into a debate about gun laws. Some people would likely use their rights to defend their rights to protect their loved ones, while some believe guns will not work here. The general theme here is that ICE is making the violence.
Overall, the tone of this conversation is one of frustration, anger, and a deep distrust of the authorities. It’s about the perceived injustice of the situation and the underlying belief that this raid is more about political grandstanding than actual law enforcement. This isn’t just about immigration. It’s about a system that appears to be broken and a group of people who are constantly at risk of being targeted for reasons that seem to be based on race and political preference.