A six-year-old girl from Queens and her mother were detained by federal agents in New York City and are now held in a Texas detention facility, while her teenage brother is in New Jersey. The family, originally from Ecuador, was apprehended following a routine check-in at immigration court. According to a spokesperson, the family entered the country illegally in 2022 and has received final orders of removal, however, local officials are working with legal aid to assist the family.

Read the original article here

Queens girl, 6, and mom grabbed by ICE at routine NYC check-in. This headline is just brutal, isn’t it? It immediately paints a picture of a family, living their lives in Queens, subjected to a sudden and jarring separation. The fact that it happened during a routine immigration check-in, a process they were already engaged in, is particularly disturbing. This wasn’t a surprise raid; they were following the rules, doing what was asked of them, and still, they were targeted.

They were appearing for an immigration check-in, and this detail is crucial. This implies that regardless of their initial entry into the country, they were already in the system. They were actively participating in the legal process, attending the immigration court hearings designed to determine their status. This is where it gets really problematic. ICE’s actions, in this situation, seem to have deliberately interrupted the court schedule, essentially denying these individuals their due process rights. They were detained before the judge could even make a decision about their case. It’s a blatant disregard for the very system that’s supposed to be in place to ensure fairness.

Councilmember Shekar Krishnan’s statement really highlights the human impact. He mentions that the little girl, Dayra, should be getting ready for school, buying supplies. Instead, she and her mother are in a detention facility, thousands of miles away. It’s a stark contrast that underscores the disruption to their lives, the fear, and the uncertainty they must be experiencing. The family, originally from Ecuador, showing up to 26 Federal Plaza for their scheduled check-in, demonstrates their willingness to cooperate with the system. And what happens? They get punished. This sends a chilling message, doesn’t it? It reinforces the idea that even if you’re trying to do things “the right way,” you’re still at risk.

Now, the questions start to pile up. How do we allow this to continue? What can be done to stop this? The frustration is palpable. People have been protesting, contacting representatives, raising funds, and voting, but the situation persists. It’s easy to feel completely powerless in the face of such actions. It’s truly disheartening to feel like your efforts just aren’t making a difference. There’s a deep, understandable desire to see those in power held accountable, to have those responsible for these actions face consequences.

There is a palpable anger towards the motivations behind this type of action. The focus isn’t on the legalities of their immigration status, but rather the bad faith actions against an innocent family. It’s not about protecting the country; it’s about causing trauma, disrupting lives, and sowing fear within communities. The sentiment that there is a fear of the new sister-in-law from Cambodia needing to check in with immigration court is completely valid. The thought of putting more trauma onto a family that has already been hurt is devastating.

This is being called “kidnapping,” and it’s hard to argue with that label. Following due process, which is meant to protect people, now seems to yield the same result as not following it: potential detention and deportation. It’s a tragic situation where the very systems designed to offer protection are being used to harm people. The bleakness of the options is hard to comprehend: either face the uncertainty of the system or try to stay hidden, hoping for some kind of relief in the future. It’s a stark reality for a population seeking a better life.

The idea of a “private Constitutional Protection Force” is a desperate call for help, a recognition that the existing law enforcement isn’t providing the protection needed. It’s a call for people to find ways to safeguard themselves, to provide backup, because the official channels aren’t working. This is a sign of a complete breakdown in trust in the very system that’s supposed to uphold the law. It’s hard to ignore the desperation in the words.

There’s also the unsettling suggestion that judges might be complicit, dismissing cases to facilitate deportation. The fact that ICE appears to be targeting the “easy targets,” those already following the rules, is another layer of cynicism. It’s easier to grab people at check-ins than to pursue more difficult cases.

The statement that “a huge part of America reads this and says, ‘It doesn’t affect me, so I don’t care’” is a really depressing truth. The indifference of some is what fuels the perpetuation of these events. The focus on economic issues while ignoring human rights is frustrating. The frustration is understandable. The desire for any kind of effective intervention, to see the law actually enforced, to protect vulnerable families, is a very real and urgent need.