By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Jake and Rebecca Haro have been charged with murder in the death of their 7-month-old son, Emmanuel, whose body has yet to be found. Both parents were also charged with filing a false police report. At their arraignment, which was continued to September 4th, the couple did not enter a plea. This case has drawn significant media attention following Rebecca Haro’s report that Emmanuel was kidnapped while she was changing his diaper. This is not Jake Haro’s first run-in with the law; he previously pleaded guilty to child cruelty charges in 2023.
Read the original article here
Haros charged with murder of son, 7-month-old Emmanuel, in Riverside County, a shocking turn of events that, based on the evidence presented, may not be so surprising after all. This is especially true considering the history of violence and abuse linked to the father. The man, seemingly the same individual who had a previous conviction for the willful cruelty of his infant daughter from a past relationship, now faces the ultimate charge. Adding another layer of tragedy is the daughter’s current condition: she’s paralyzed and has sustained severe brain damage, requiring ongoing care. It’s a chilling example of how past actions can serve as a haunting prelude to further, devastating crimes.
The fact that the father was seen searching with law enforcement in the desert for a body, even before a murder charge was filed, raises questions about the prosecution’s strategy. One question is: is it normal to charge with murder before finding a body? While it may seem unusual, the legal system has shown it is possible. It seems they may have had enough evidence to file charges. Considering the father’s prior conviction for child cruelty, this new charge of murder seems almost inevitable. The father, given his history, should have been kept far away from any opportunity to harm another child.
The focus has quickly shifted to the mother and her potential involvement in the baby’s death, or at the very least, the cover-up. There is speculation about her role in the crime, with many wondering if she was an accomplice or complicit in some way. This raises an important question: Was the mother involved, or was she merely a participant in the cover-up? There is no question that this is a heartbreaking case, as the situation was evident from the beginning. Many are expressing a wish for justice for the innocent baby.
The potential signs of domestic violence are also being highlighted, as the mother was seen with a black eye. This could indicate the couple was also involved in a cycle of violence, adding another layer of complexity and sorrow to the case. The severity of the daughter’s injuries, and the light sentence the father received in the past, highlight the systemic issues at play in these cases. The father’s past actions, including his prior conviction for child abuse, make this event, unfortunately, not surprising. There is a pervasive sense that the legal system failed to adequately protect the children involved in the past, allowing this tragedy to unfold.
The legal system had allowed the father to be granted probation and even work release after the previous brutal assault on his daughter. This highlights concerns about the leniency shown to child abusers. It makes you wonder: why was he ever allowed to be near another child? It is difficult to understand why he was allowed to keep custody of any child after what he had previously done. There seems to be a real disconnect. The system seems to fail those most vulnerable.
The medical aspect of the previous case, with the focus on the infant daughter’s injuries, provides a grim perspective. The medical professionals in the NICU and PICU see the extent of abuse suffered by children, and it’s a traumatic experience. The x-rays and blood work revealed how much the child had been through. The trauma experienced by the child in the past, and the horrific consequences, would be enough to solidify the father’s guilt and the severity of his crimes.
The search for Emmanuel, and the lack of a body, is also an important aspect of the case. The father’s willingness to cooperate with the authorities, and the possibility of a plea deal, suggests he may have confessed to the crime and is now cooperating. However, even without the body, the authorities may have enough evidence, such as bloodstains, to proceed with the murder charge. This is not entirely unusual, especially when the victim is a young child.
Given the circumstances, the lack of a body may not be the determining factor in this case. It is very possible that coyotes, mountain lions, or turkey buzzards could have destroyed any trace of the baby. The baby was missing for some time. Therefore, the father will be held accountable for his alleged actions. The case reflects a tragic reality: the vulnerability of children and the horrific acts that some individuals are capable of committing. The rage is palpable.