By John Q. Hosedrinker According to a senior Hamas official, Ghazi Hamad, the October 7th attacks have successfully revitalized the push for Palestinian statehood on a global scale. During an interview with Al Jazeera, Hamad stated that without Hamas’s use of weapons, the world would not be focused on their cause. This statement implies that the militant group believes its actions have brought international attention to the Palestinian issue.
Read the original article here
Hamas official boasts Oct. 7 ‘resistance’ revived Palestinian statehood push around the globe.
It’s frankly unsettling, isn’t it? The idea that a Hamas official would *boast* about the October 7th attacks and their supposed role in pushing for Palestinian statehood globally is a chilling illustration of how twisted this situation has become. It’s like they’re taking credit for a resurgence in support, even though the horrific events of that day were directly responsible for the immense suffering of so many. The fact that Hamas seems to believe this has somehow given them a win is beyond disturbing.
The undeniable reality is that the actions of October 7th caused immense pain, loss, and global condemnation. It’s hard to imagine how they can expect Palestinians to believe that the price paid in blood and suffering was worth it. Ultimately, Hamas’ survival depends on convincing their people that it was, and it’s difficult to see how they will be able to achieve this. There’s a valid point to be made that any future Palestinian state shouldn’t be built on the foundation of hate and terrorism. Many believe the dissolution and disarmament of Hamas should be a prerequisite for the international community to accept a Palestinian state. Giving terrorists what they want simply emboldens more terrorists.
What’s even more alarming is the apparent cold calculation behind it all. It’s like they’re saying, “You’re only recognizing Palestine because we killed a bunch of people.” It suggests a complete disregard for the human cost of their actions, and they seem to be happy about the suffering that’s been inflicted. This attitude shows a severe lack of regard for human life. It is worth questioning whether a group with such values should be in any position of leadership or governance.
Then there’s the point about how other nations and major players are involved. The fact that some nations seem to be running to Hamas’ assistance – or at least supporting their cause – is noteworthy. It is disheartening that in this day and age, there are those who openly reward terrorists for their crimes against innocent people.
The fact that the world’s navies may need to police the Persian Gulf and Red Sea to secure trade routes reveals the broader implications of the conflict. It’s a harsh reminder that this isn’t just about two groups fighting; it has implications on international stability. And when you consider that military mobilization is more realistically within the scope of the United States, it highlights the complexities of the situation.
Of course, the world is a complex place, and many view things differently. One thing everyone should be able to agree upon is that the actions of October 7th are unforgivable, as are any actions that follow with the intent to cause civilian casualties and the destruction that has occurred since. It’s vital to acknowledge that both sides have committed unforgivable acts, and those responsible need to be held accountable.
The situation on the ground is more complex than just the statehood issue, and you can’t ignore the loss of human life, the lack of any real separate state, and the lack of basic human rights. The fact that those who are suffering the most – the Palestinians – are the least likely to be able to influence the situation is a tragedy. The fact that Hamas never seems to miss an opportunity to remind the world who they are, while the whole world has no problem with Netenyahu and his leadership, is just mind-blowing.
The reality is that the current situation is pushing for a Palestinian state, but one can question whether it’s because of Hamas’ actions or Israel’s response. Israel’s actions in the aftermath and before October 7th have caused the destruction that is now contributing to the push for Palestinian statehood. This is not to diminish the horrors of the attack, but it is a recognition of the impact of the response and the long-term consequences.
The cold, calculating nature of Hamas is particularly chilling. It’s as if the loss of life is simply a strategic calculation toward a larger goal. The ability to brag about the deaths of 60,000 people shows a lack of regard for human life. This is not merely a political conflict; it’s a crisis of humanity.