The article highlights the recent deployment of National Guard troops from several states, primarily in the Deep South, to Washington, D.C., ostensibly to address rising crime rates, echoing a narrative promoted by Donald Trump. However, a comparison of crime statistics reveals a striking irony: the murder rates in the capitals and major cities of the states sending troops to D.C. are significantly higher than those in the nation’s capital. This raises the question of why these states are not focusing their resources on their own cities. The piece suggests a counter-strategy: Democratic governors from states with lower crime rates should offer their National Guards to assist in cities experiencing higher crime rates in the states deploying troops to D.C.
Read the original article here
The GOP States With Guards Deployed to D.C. Have Urban Murder Rates Way Higher Than D.C.’s, and it’s a statement that really gets you thinking. What’s going on here? It’s a strange situation, isn’t it? Red states, sending their National Guard to patrol Washington D.C. while their own cities are struggling with some serious crime issues.
It’s almost as if this whole thing isn’t about crime at all, but something else entirely. It’s about sending a message, a signal to the American people. This message is clear: these red states are ready to back Trump up, no matter what. It’s all very performative. Some might see this as a dress rehearsal, a way to get ready for the upcoming elections, maybe even a test run for potentially taking over blue cities and arresting Democratic leaders. The irony is thick, because the areas with the highest murder rates are often in deeply conservative cities.
You have to ask yourself, where are these states even getting the money to deploy troops? Is the government footing the bill? This all starts to feel like it’s straight out of a fascist playbook. It’s a classic move to try and rile up the base, while seemingly ignoring the real issues in their own backyards.
Let’s be clear, this isn’t about protecting anyone. It’s about projecting an image of strength and control. It’s about playing the blame game, criticizing blue states while conveniently overlooking the issues in their own communities. The problem is, this sort of strategy does not and will not resonate with rational thinkers. It is simply not productive.
If you’re looking at the situation objectively, you have to ask why these troops are in D.C. in the first place. Are they really “patrolling”? Reports suggest they’re not even equipped for police work. No handcuffs, radios, flashlights, and in some cases, no weapons. Their main function seems to be to simply be present.
There’s also the fact that the narrative is already being twisted. People are questioning the accuracy of D.C.’s crime numbers, as if the truth doesn’t matter, only the story that fits their pre-conceived notions. It’s all designed to create fear and division. It’s a distraction from the actual problems plaguing the nation.
And here’s the real kicker: it seems like these states aren’t interested in helping their own citizens. Why aren’t they focusing on the cities that really need help to get crime rates down? Why aren’t they protecting the lives of their own supporters? Memphis needs help, surely? But instead, the focus is on D.C.
This all raises a lot of questions, doesn’t it? Why are the guards stationed in tourist areas, where there isn’t much crime, instead of the areas that are actually struggling? The answer is simple: it’s about optics. It’s about creating a narrative, a story.
The pushback we’re seeing now stems directly from the aftermath of January 6th. This isn’t about crime; it’s about control. It’s about projecting power and influence. It’s about the rise of an ideology.
The fact is, if the leaders in these states were truly interested in solving the problem, they would work towards solutions, not exacerbate them. High poverty, income inequality, lack of education and employment opportunities, coupled with easy access to guns, tend to create a breeding ground for the kind of violence we’re seeing. It’s a simple equation. They may call it “law and order” but this isn’t the answer.
Unfortunately, it seems the real intent is to gain more control for their own benefit, regardless of how it impacts the lives of the people they are supposed to represent. It all points to a deeply troubling trend, a sign that the country is in a precarious position.
