By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Wyoming Representative Harriet Hageman faced a hostile reception at a town hall event in Pinedale while defending the potential repeal of the EPA’s “endangerment finding” regarding greenhouse gases. Hageman asserted the finding was based on “false science,” sparking boos and shouts from the audience. This event marks another instance of Hageman encountering an angry crowd over Trump administration policies, with similar reactions seen in a previous town hall in Laramie. Despite the state’s strong support for Trump, local concerns about poor air quality and widespread belief in climate change appear to be at odds with the administration’s stance on emission standards.
Read the original article here
The heart of the matter, as the story goes, is a town hall in Pinedale, Wyoming, where Republican Representative Harriet Hageman faced a furious crowd. The central point of contention? Hageman’s attempts to downplay and deny the reality of climate change. The atmosphere, by all accounts, was electric with discontent. Locals didn’t mince words, shouting “Lie, lie!” and expressing their outrage at her stance.
Hageman, undeterred, tried to defend the government’s plan to repeal the EPA’s “endangerment finding.” This finding, based on extensive scientific evidence, declares greenhouse gases a threat to public health and welfare. Her bold statement, “CO2 is not a pollutant,” ignited a firestorm of disapproval. This wasn’t just a disagreement; it was a public rebuke, showcasing a deep chasm between the representative and her constituents on a crucial issue.
It’s not just this recent event either. The article mentions a similar situation in Laramie, Wyoming, earlier in the year. Videos from that town hall show Hageman struggling to be heard amidst the boos and jeers, even when discussing seemingly unrelated topics like DOGE. This pattern suggests a broader disconnect between Hageman and the people she represents.
The article underlines that, despite Wyoming’s overall conservative leanings, the very county where this recent town hall took place is grappling with poor air quality, linked to natural gas fields and related activities. It’s a practical issue, a tangible effect of decisions that directly impacts the community. This fact makes the representative’s stance on climate change even more perplexing to many. A poll from the University of Wyoming indicates that a vast majority of Wyoming residents now believe climate change is real and want action taken, further highlighting how Hageman is out of sync with her constituents.
The article then provides some context on the science behind the issue. It points out that the basic science of the greenhouse effect has been known for over two centuries. One particularly poignant comment noted the irony of climate denial, especially given the proven role of carbon dioxide as a harmful substance. The article also references the “Firehose of Falsehood,” a propaganda technique where a rapid, repetitive stream of misinformation is used to influence opinion.
The comments section reveals a deep frustration and a sense of disbelief about how such viewpoints gain traction. There are questions about motives, ranging from sheer ignorance to outright greed. Some wonder if this is a religious stance or just a result of a lack of basic understanding. There’s also a strong undercurrent of the dangers of a population that doesn’t accept what’s in front of them.
The discussion turns to personal observations, some that were quite humorous in their observations. There are comparisons to the appearance of the representative, and the idea that the persona is similar to that of a villain, and an overall disconnect to the average citizen. There is a sense of bewilderment at the political landscape and the choices being made.
The closing thoughts are clear: The situation in Pinedale is not just a local incident. It mirrors a larger issue, where a politician’s views clash dramatically with the concerns of her constituents. There is an implication that these politicians are out of touch and potentially endangering the public, whether they know it or not. The article is a powerful reminder of the growing gap between scientific consensus and political reality on climate change.