By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Gabbard, when questioned about evidence of Obama’s involvement in the Russia hoax, pointed viewers to her website. She claimed the website contains heavily redacted versions of a report detailing Obama’s alleged orchestration of the intelligence manipulation. Specifically, Gabbard cited a National Security Council meeting focused on Russia, and a report stemming from that meeting that she claims outlines tasks distributed to intelligence officials.
Read the original article here
Tulsi Gabbard’s “Irrefutable” Obama Evidence Is a Big Pile of Nothing, and that’s the long and the short of it. It’s not even clear what she’s *trying* to claim. Are we talking about the 2016 Senate Intelligence Committee report? Is she implying Obama cooked that up? The report, by the way, concluded that Russia aggressively interfered in the 2016 election. Funny, isn’t it, how that’s supposed to be “irrefutable” evidence?
This whole charade reeks of distraction, a well-worn tactic to shift attention away from the real issues. Let’s be frank: it’s likely a desperate attempt to get the focus off of the Trump-Epstein connection. They need something big, something flashy, to take the spotlight away from that. And who better to play the foil than Obama, the typical target for this crowd? It’s a time-worn playbook, and it’s transparent to anyone with a modicum of critical thinking skills.
Consider this: Marco Rubio’s Senate Intelligence Committee, after spending three years and reviewing mountains of evidence, somehow missed this “explosive news.” But Tulsi, with apparently no real investigation, magically uncovers a conspiracy? Come on. Any person with a functioning brain cell can see how ludicrous this is. It exposes the level of intelligence of those who actually believe her. It’s almost as if she’s stumbled upon top-secret intelligence that unveils an even deeper link between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Think about Obama’s actions in 2016: sanctions, expulsions, shutting down Russian diplomatic properties. That paints a picture of something far more significant than mere social media meddling. But what does this all amount to? A huge pile of something that can only be described as bullshit. She should be held accountable for these fabrications. This “evidence” from a supposed Russian collaborator is nothing but lies.
It really seems like she’s lost her way. The media has failed us all, but especially when it comes to people like Tulsi Gabbard. For her, it’s about staying relevant and getting ahead, even if it means peddling falsehoods. This whole thing is just another shiny object, meant to distract from what really matters: the very real issues facing our country and the truth about the people running it.
There’s also a suspicion here that she’s angling for a better position, maybe a higher-profile role, likely hoping for another presidential run. The whole thing is like she was tasked with crafting something out of nothing, all in an effort to distract from the looming revelations of the Epstein files. It’s all a calculated move. It’s like they’re testing the waters to see just how stupid they can make us look.
The whole situation boils down to this: Russia meddled in the 2016 election. Obama, quite reasonably, wanted to understand the extent of that interference, and whether or not it altered the outcome. For this, he’s suddenly a traitor, according to the narrative. But of course, the real crime here is the glossing over of any actual, tangible crime, like the Epstein files.
Let’s not forget the fact that as U.S. intelligence services were justifiably monitoring Russian operatives, Trump campaign figures were often on the other end of the line. This “irrefutable” evidence is just another attempt to change the channel, to focus on anything other than the truth. It’s a game, and we’re all stuck watching the players.
The entire situation makes you ask, “How stupid do they think we are?”. But that’s the wrong question. The question is: how successful are these tactics, and how can we work to expose this nonsense?