By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Prosecutors in Florida have cleared Officer Bowers of any wrongdoing after he was filmed punching a driver during a traffic stop. The incident, which garnered attention after a video captured the officer’s actions, stemmed from a traffic stop where the driver, William McNeil Jr., refused to comply with the officer’s commands. According to the State Attorney’s Office, body camera footage supported the officer’s account, showing multiple warnings before the window was broken and force was used during the arrest. Despite Mr. McNeil’s claims of injury and the release of his own video, prosecutors determined the officer’s actions were justified, with McNeil later pleading guilty to resisting an officer and driving with a suspended license.
Read the original article here
Prosecutors clear Florida officer who punched man in traffic stop, and it’s hard not to feel a certain sense of disbelief. How can an officer repeatedly punching a man in the face warrant absolutely no disciplinary action, no charges, and no punishment of any kind? It’s a question that immediately springs to mind, especially when contrasted with the level of punishment some seemingly less serious infractions can attract. For example, the contrast between a man throwing a Subway sandwich from a couple of feet away at a fully equipped officer versus the officer’s actions – it really does make one question the definition of assault.
Prosecutors clearing the officer in this instance seems to have a predictable undertone: “We investigated ourselves and determined we did nothing wrong.” The feeling is that the “thin blue line” is protecting its own. There’s a certain cynicism that arises, the idea that prosecutors and police are intertwined in a system designed to protect officers, regardless of their actions. It’s hard not to see a pattern here: the officer gets a pass, while the man who may have been on the receiving end of the officer’s actions, seems to be presumed guilty.
The details of the traffic stop add further fuel to the fire. The officer allegedly pulled the man over because his car was parked, not in motion, and his headlights weren’t on. The officer’s reasoning could be seen as finding a reason to escalate the situation, as they may not have been following the actual law that applies to a moving vehicle. The man being punched, clearly, was not a proportionate response to what was considered a traffic violation. It makes the whole situation feel fueled by something else, maybe spite.
The whole thing makes you question how any of this is considered acceptable, and the idea that cops should never be punching someone, especially in a traffic stop. The fact that a lawyer, Ben Crump, representing the man involved and Harry Daniels, called on the federal government to investigate the incident further, seems only natural and logical. They, understandably, lack faith that local authorities will bring justice.
The official justification often focuses on the details that followed the initial contact. The officer, according to the prosecutors, punched the man “in the struggle to gain” his compliance, and it was later determined that there was drug paraphernalia and a large knife in his car. But what the video shows and what the prosecutors claim are at odds. However, that does not justify the officer’s actions. It does not absolve him.
The idea that the prosecutor is choosing who gets the benefit of a jury is also present here. It is obvious that a white officer being cleared of wrongdoing for punching a black man is a classic case of things playing out predictably. It suggests a systemic problem, a cultural issue within the police department, rather than an isolated incident. It’s the kind of thing that erodes trust in the system and further fuels the divide between law enforcement and the communities they serve.
It is not an exaggeration to state, given this, that it is a deeply concerning situation. It’s hard to see the prosecutors’ decision as anything other than a sign of the systemic issues within the police department. It is the type of thing that encourages people to feel as if they are in danger, leading to violence and retaliation. It’s a dangerous cycle, and it needs to be broken. The fact that the police officer won’t face consequences feels like a betrayal of justice.
The situation described will likely lead to civil settlement. The local community is not going to forget it any time soon. The decision by the local authorities is something that does a disservice to the community. This is why cops are referred to as pigs. And the fact that the investigation into the incident determined that the officer did nothing wrong is, in a word, pathetic.
The seemingly endless police assaults being swept under the rug are going to lead to increasingly violent retaliation. A lawless society facing a tyrannical government will take the law into their own hands. Push people hard enough, oppress them enough, and eventually…they will push back with a force they can’t even fathom. The whole thing smells bad, and makes a person feel bad. It is hard not to feel contempt for those in positions of power.