By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A federal judge has issued a restraining order preventing the Trump administration from deporting ten unaccompanied Guatemalan children, citing potential violations of US laws. The order, issued Sunday, halts deportations for 14 days and calls for a hearing. The National Immigration Law Center, representing the children aged 10-17, argues that these deportations would violate protections afforded to vulnerable children, potentially exposing them to harm in Guatemala. The planned deportations followed an agreement between the Trump administration and Guatemala, with the government’s response to the order being delayed.
Read the original article here
Federal judge blocks US from deporting unaccompanied children to Guatemala, and the very idea feels like a punch to the gut, doesn’t it? Forget the legal jargon for a moment. How can we, as a society, even contemplate sending children, alone and vulnerable, to another country? It just feels inherently wrong. The fact that this was even a plan, let alone something that needed to be *blocked* by a judge, is a dark reflection of where we are.
Federal judge blocks US from deporting unaccompanied children to Guatemala, and one can’t help but ask: what exactly were the plans? Knowing the history of the administration, with their documented track record on immigration, it’s hard not to let the mind wander to darker possibilities. The idea of children potentially ending up in situations of exploitation is a chilling thought. And it’s difficult to reconcile the actions of the administration with the values they often proclaim to uphold. The situation underscores the importance of safeguarding the most vulnerable, particularly children. The administration, and those who enabled these actions, have shown where their moral compass points.
Federal judge blocks US from deporting unaccompanied children to Guatemala. Let’s not kid ourselves here; the intentions behind this policy were, at best, questionable. The fact that a judge had to intervene speaks volumes about the lack of ethical consideration. The government has a process to care for these children. The process outlined in federal law requires them to send them to shelters until they can be placed with family members or foster homes. To think that the Trump administration wanted to go against that is a true travesty.
Federal judge blocks US from deporting unaccompanied children to Guatemala, and it’s easy to see the underlying motivations. The administration’s actions regarding immigration have consistently prioritized certain political goals over basic human decency. The very fact that this was on the table shows a complete disregard for the children’s welfare.
Federal judge blocks US from deporting unaccompanied children to Guatemala. This entire situation is a stark illustration of the ethical bankruptcy that can pervade when political agendas take precedence over moral principles. The fact that people in positions of power would even consider such a thing is appalling.
Federal judge blocks US from deporting unaccompanied children to Guatemala. The argument is that we can not accept these children, the argument claims that their parents shouldn’t have put them in this position, and then sending them home is what’s best. What about the investigation? The fact that so many children are disappearing once they are allowed to enter the country, some with sponsors that are unknown is a terrifying fact.
Federal judge blocks US from deporting unaccompanied children to Guatemala. This is not a question of political leanings. It is a basic question of humanity. Any administration that prioritizes political gain over the well-being of children has lost its moral compass. This decision, blocked by a judge, should be a source of shame, and a reminder of what happens when we allow our leaders to abandon their fundamental responsibilities.