By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Newly released FBI data reveals a significant decrease in both violent and property crime in 2024, contradicting former President Donald Trump’s assertions of a surging crime wave. The report indicates a 4.5% drop in violent crime and an 8.1% decrease in property crime, with declines across all violent crime categories. This data directly contrasts with Trump’s frequent claims on the campaign trail, where he blamed Democrats and immigrants for rising crime rates, a narrative used to justify his mass deportation policies. Despite previous attempts to discredit the FBI’s data, this report highlights a safer America during the last year of Joe Biden’s presidency.
Read the original article here
FBI Reveals Trump’s Crime Wave Only Existed in His Head
Okay, so, let’s unpack this whole “crime wave” thing, shall we? It seems the FBI, in its infinite wisdom, has effectively stated what a lot of us probably already suspected: the alarming surge in crime that Trump has been constantly yapping about? Yeah, turns out, it largely existed only in his own, well, let’s call it *vivid* imagination. Or, more accurately, it was a carefully constructed narrative designed to scare people.
The thing is, this isn’t some sort of groundbreaking revelation. The evidence has been there all along. Crime statistics, the very data the FBI deals with, have consistently shown a decline in violent crime over the years. And yet, the rhetoric has been so relentlessly focused on a supposed crime crisis. It is pretty wild how many people seemed genuinely freaked out, and honestly, that tells you a lot about the power of the narrative and the effectiveness of his messaging. And yes, there will always be crime, but the overall trend isn’t supporting the “sky is falling” alarmism.
It’s like, you try to counter the narrative with actual facts. You calmly mention the data showing decreasing crime rates, and you’re met with blank stares, as if you’ve just revealed that cats can’t fly. People are so deeply invested in the idea of a crime-ridden dystopia that they’re resistant to any information that contradicts it. This highlights the importance of questioning the source of information, especially if it confirms your pre-existing biases.
And let’s be honest, the media hasn’t always helped. Instead of challenging the claims, they would often just parrot whatever Trump was saying. It became less about the truth and more about the spectacle. Like the comments point out, even when a narrative was debunked, the focus would quickly shift back to the next inflammatory statement. Debates, news coverage… it all seemed to feed this fear.
The scary thing is how well this worked. Because the fear he instilled created a powerful motivation to rally behind him. The idea of an external threat is a key element of the autocrat’s playbook, and it seems to have worked like a charm. It’s a recurring theme, and it plays on the insecurities that many people feel. This is even reflected in how people speak today, with casual conversations about “strangers” or the state of the streets, often laced with fear. It’s all part of the story that Trump was trying to tell.
Of course, the accusations about him also include criminal acts. He’s allegedly involved in a variety of legal troubles, ranging from the January 6th insurrection to the Epstein files. You know, things that *actually* could be considered crime waves. But he keeps pushing the narrative of a crime wave elsewhere to deflect from his own alleged activities. It’s classic deflection tactics, the same ones used by con men and people who are, well, you know… in trouble with the law.
In a sense, Trump is the crime wave. Not in some abstract, theoretical way, but in the very tangible reality of his actions and the consequences of his behavior. His history suggests a pattern of shady deals, ethical breaches, and outright lies. He’s a master manipulator, a purveyor of misinformation, and the embodiment of the very things he claims to be fighting against.
The real tragedy here is that this manufactured fear has real-world consequences. It fuels division, it justifies draconian policies, and it erodes trust in institutions. It’s the perfect recipe for a society where people are more willing to accept authoritarianism because it’s presented as the solution to a problem that, in many ways, doesn’t actually exist.
And the saddest part? Many of his supporters *believe* him. Feelings, they say, are more important than facts. And that, right there, is the core of the problem. The fact that people are willing to accept his version of reality over actual data.