By John Q. Hosedrinker 
European leaders are urging Donald Trump to include Ukraine in a planned summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Concerns have been raised, particularly from Germany, about any potential deals that exclude Ukraine and its interests. While the US is aiming for a summit involving Trump, Putin, and Zelenskyy, European officials have emphasized the necessity of Ukraine’s involvement and a potential ceasefire. Several leaders across Europe have stated that decisions regarding Ukraine’s future must include Ukraine, and any negotiations should consider its sovereignty and security.
Read the original article here
Europe’s leaders are definitely turning up the heat on Donald Trump, and the core of their concern revolves around the upcoming potential summit between the US and Russia, particularly regarding the exclusion of Ukraine from the discussion. The fear is palpable: any agreement reached without Ukraine’s direct involvement could essentially be a deal stitched together over their heads, potentially sacrificing their interests and sovereignty in the process. It’s a high-stakes situation, and the European leaders are rightly pushing for Ukraine’s inclusion in these crucial talks.
The crux of the issue, as many see it, is the potential for Trump to prioritize his own image as a dealmaker above all else. The worry is that he might be tempted to strike a deal with Putin that favors Russia, regardless of the consequences for Ukraine. The idea of Trump wanting to be the one who “made a deal when Biden couldn’t” is a powerful motivator in this scenario, particularly if that deal involves sacrificing Ukraine’s territorial integrity or conceding to Russian demands. This approach would render the entire process a sham, essentially legitimizing an occupation rather than securing genuine peace. It’s like trying to solve a dispute without listening to one of the parties involved – it’s simply not a viable path to a fair or lasting solution.
The sentiment from Europe, particularly as voiced by Germany’s leader, is clear: any discussion about Ukraine’s future, including potentially its territory, must involve Ukraine. This is not just a matter of principle; it’s a matter of practicality. A deal crafted without Ukraine’s participation is unlikely to be respected or upheld. It could be viewed as an imposition, not an agreement, and would probably fail in the long run. It would also be seen by Russia as an opportunity to continue what they are doing now.
There are serious concerns about the potential for backroom dealings, driven by self-serving motives. Some suggest that Trump’s financial ties to Russia could sway him toward a deal that benefits his own business interests, potentially involving Russian investment in his assets. This raises red flags, because it creates a conflict of interest and further complicates the already intricate dynamics of international politics. It’s a perception that fuels the urgency with which European leaders are calling for Ukraine’s inclusion.
The situation in Ukraine itself highlights the stark differences between the two sides. Ukraine is fighting to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Russia, on the other hand, initiated the conflict and has consistently misrepresented its intentions. The suggestion that the two are somehow equivalent is a misinterpretation. Ukraine is acting within its rights to seek support from allies and fight for its survival. Russia’s aggression is the root cause of the conflict, and they need to be held accountable for their actions.
The European leaders also have a clear vision for how the conflict should end: with Ukraine in control of its own destiny and its future in their hands. They are acutely aware of the historical and economic consequences of a failed peace agreement that favors Russia. Their willingness to help Ukraine, financially and in terms of support, shows they have a strong dedication to seeing this crisis resolved justly.
The pressure from Europe is about more than just ensuring a fair outcome. It’s also about maintaining the unity of the Western alliance and sending a clear message to both Russia and the world. Europe will not stand by and allow its values and interests to be undermined. The US must realize it cannot dictate the terms of any peace without including Ukraine. The potential for any deal that doesn’t prioritize Ukraine’s needs will only serve to embolden Russia.
Essentially, the European leaders are standing up for the principles of international law and sovereignty. It is the only path to a lasting peace in Europe and the only path to a peace that all parties will respect and support. If Trump were to proceed without Ukraine’s input, it would not only undermine the peace process but would also damage the relationship with Europe.
Finally, the ultimate fate of the war rests in the hands of those involved in the fighting, and any diplomatic efforts will face considerable resistance. Russia may be facing setbacks on the battlefield, but that doesn’t necessarily mean Putin will act rationally. It’s up to the world to prevent this from happening. Any deals will have to take into account these realities, ensuring that Ukraine is at the table and that its interests are at the forefront of any discussions.