By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The article examines the ongoing fallout of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, focusing on the lack of concern for the victims from the Trump administration. The article highlights the voices of survivors who feel ignored and further traumatized by the administration’s actions, which appear to prioritize political maneuvering over justice for the abused. The Justice Department is reportedly being used to protect Trump, who has downplayed the scandal. This has raised concerns about a potential cover-up, especially regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, and the possibility of a pardon.
Read the original article here
Epstein victims are a growing political threat to Trump.
It appears that the anticipation of victims coming forward is building, and the expectation is that their experiences will directly contradict Trump’s narrative. The natural progression, as seen with Trump’s usual tactics, suggests he’ll likely launch attacks against these individuals, a move almost guaranteed to be amplified by his supporters. The prediction is that it’s a matter of time before derogatory comments are directed at the victims. The concern is very real that these women, should they speak up, need protection, given the potential for harassment and harm from his base.
The idea of considering these women as both Trump and Epstein victims highlights the complex nature of their situation and the potential legal and political ramifications. There is a strong fear that the legal and political obstacles these victims face will be immense. The question of accountability is also raised, particularly in light of the potential for Trump to twist the narrative, portraying himself as the victim.
There’s a very real worry that any attempt to speak out might be met with severe consequences, including potential threats or even the tragic appearance of “suicides,” a tactic that further complicates the situation. The need for these victims to be protected is constantly emphasized. The fear is that his supporters could potentially turn violent or aggressive toward these victims.
The core of the argument revolves around the idea that Trump and those supporting him are capable of any tactics to protect him. The potential for this to involve the manipulation of law enforcement or intelligence agencies is something that the victims have to be extremely concerned about. It’s also suggested that those who support him are likely to support anything he does.
The conversation touches on the potential for these victims to band together and tell their stories, perhaps through a book or a speaking tour. This action has potential to damage him and his reputation. It raises concerns about how Trump’s supporters might react to such a coordinated effort.
It’s important to note that the success of Trump’s strategies in the past makes this a concern. He has often turned accusations against his opponents, and there’s a distinct likelihood that the same tactics will be employed here. The fear is that his supporters may not change their minds.
The potential for “MAGA media” to normalize the crimes of child rape within their leadership is a very real concern. It also brings up questions as to why no significant financial support or organized effort has emerged to assist the victims. It brings to question the lack of progress in any potential legal actions that could be pursued.
The conversation also acknowledges the existence of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), which, while potentially limiting public statements, wouldn’t necessarily prevent reporting to law enforcement. If, however, these NDAs hinder victims’ ability to speak out, there is a conflict with the right to free speech. The fact that some victims may have already reported crimes to law enforcement and that Epstein was convicted of them further complicates the matter.