By John Q. Hosedrinker 
While criticisms of the Trump team’s handling of the situation are common, their strategy of stonewalling and lying may be their only option. Even some within the MAGA base are expressing concern, with figures like Candace Owens suggesting Trump is surrounded by people who undermine him. The Epstein scandal, at the heart of the matter involving the alleged rape of children, appears to be a point where even loyal supporters are struggling to overlook the moral implications, potentially surpassing political tribalism for the first time in a decade.
Read the original article here
On Epstein, Even MAGA World Can Smell That Trump Is Hiding Something | We’re four weeks into the current iteration of the Epstein scandal. And there is no way it’s going away. The lingering cloud of the Epstein scandal, particularly its implications for Donald Trump, is proving remarkably resilient, even within the staunchly loyal MAGA ranks. The fact that this particular iteration is still relevant, four weeks in, speaks volumes about the underlying unease that persists. The persistent lack of transparency and the continued silence surrounding the unredacted files fuel suspicion and contribute to a growing sense that something significant is being concealed. This feeling isn’t just confined to those who are critical of Trump. It’s an aroma even the most ardent supporters are finding hard to ignore.
The calls for releasing the Epstein files, videos, and financials are not simply driven by a desire for justice; they are fueled by the suspicion that Trump has something to hide. The repeated mentions of incriminating evidence – the “truckload of evidence,” “tens of thousands of videos,” and nearly “$1.1B” in wire transfers – only amplify the sense of urgency and the perceived necessity of full disclosure. The constant refrain is “Release the files!” a call to action echoing across various corners of the internet, reflecting a deep-seated belief that there is a cover-up underway. The fact that the Department of Justice and the FBI determined that “no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted” only adds to the fuel on the fire, because that statement doesn’t make sense.
The core issue here goes beyond mere political disagreement; it touches upon a fundamental question of moral accountability. Even within MAGA world, there seems to be an awareness of the ethical implications of the Epstein case. The potential involvement of a figure like Trump creates a cognitive dissonance, a conflict between unwavering loyalty and the uncomfortable reality of potential child exploitation. This cognitive dissonance is apparent in the reported survey results, where a significant portion of Republicans indicated they would still support Trump even if it was confirmed he was involved in the Epstein scandal. That’s a pretty damning statement, however you look at it.
The response of many within the Trump camp to the scandal is not one of outright denial, but rather, a combination of deflection, distraction, and downplaying the significance of the revelations. The “sunk cost fallacy” is also evident in the unwavering support, as many of Trump’s followers have already invested so much in him, that they are simply unable to admit they made a mistake, or even, that he’s potentially a bad guy.
The current situation seems to be evolving into one where the scandal will simply fade from the public consciousness, with zero ramifications. The suggestion that it will “go away” underscores a cynicism about the political process. The media’s role in shaping public perception is also being scrutinized. The fear is that the media of today is a shadow of what it once was and easily distracted. It will be interesting to see if this sentiment holds true in the long run. The anticipation of future events, such as Trump’s potential future meetings, and the potential for further revelations, keeps the story alive and suggests that the matter is far from over.
The lack of accountability for the rich and powerful is another issue that is being brought up. The belief that there are no limits, and that there is no price too high to pay for power, regardless of any moral or ethical considerations, seems to be what is on display here. And yet, the core question remains: Can Trump’s actions, and the potential cover-up, withstand the scrutiny? Will the files ever be released? And most importantly, will there be any accountability? That is what we are waiting for, but are the people that need to care, willing to? That remains to be seen.