By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Attorney General Pam Bondi has initiated a grand jury investigation into the intelligence surrounding President Trump and Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election. This action follows a criminal referral from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Gabbard’s referral and accompanying declassified files allege suppression and manipulation of intelligence related to Russia’s election interference, sparking controversy and accusations of conspiracy. The Justice Department has not yet commented on the matter, while Democrats dispute the claims made by Gabbard.
Read the original article here
DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy allegations seems to be the current focus, and it’s a subject that immediately prompts a mixed reaction. On one hand, there’s a sense of bewilderment. It’s hard to escape the feeling that this is a waste of time, another exercise in political theater. Given what else is in the news, namely the persistent and troubling calls for the release of the Epstein files, this feels like a distraction. One might ask, “Do they even have any actual evidence?” Because, at its core, Russiagate isn’t a conspiracy in the way some people seem to interpret it. There were arrests, confessions, and convictions. Republicans on committees saw the evidence and affirmed the findings. This isn’t some shadowy theory; it’s a matter of public record.
DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy allegations also brings up the fundamental question of why now? And is it politically motivated? There’s a palpable suspicion that this is another instance of the weaponization of the Department of Justice, a tool being used for grievance politics and attempts at retribution. The argument is that any investigation conducted by the current DOJ lacks credibility, designed more to protect certain figures than to seek genuine justice. It’s easy to see this as a move to deflect attention from more pressing matters, like the serious accusations against former President Trump. This initiative appears to be an intentional effort to muddy the waters, confuse the public, and ultimately protect those who’ve benefited from it.
DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy allegations is bound to dredge up the past. It will rehash the events of 2016 and the alleged Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election. And yet, for many, the narrative is already clear. It’s been established, and the evidence is well-documented that Russia aided in spreading disinformation via fake accounts that were hyper-targeted by polling data provided by the Trump campaign. The Mueller Report laid out the details of what the Russian government did to assist Trump. Many people, including the Trump campaign manager, ended up in prison for their actions. Despite all this, there’s an ongoing denial of the facts, which is deeply concerning. The idea that this is all a hoax is difficult to comprehend.
DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy allegations highlights the potential futility of the exercise. Given Trump’s assertion of presidential immunity, and the existing legal and political hurdles, the outcome of this grand jury feels almost predetermined. It’s predicted that there won’t be any indictments, and the whole process will amount to wasted time and resources. It seems difficult to imagine that the investigation will reach any meaningful conclusion, especially if it is operating within a politically charged environment. There is the very real possibility that the investigation will become a source of frustration and another way to stymie justice.
DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy allegations will undoubtedly create political divisions. The fear is that this will give ammunition to those who want to discredit the investigation and obfuscate the truth. The focus will likely shift to a fight over the narrative rather than a pursuit of justice. There are concerns that this will be another GOP-led investigation that will end up going nowhere. As the public waits, there’s a collective eye-roll, and a sense of fatigue at the prospect of another round of political theater. It’s easy to understand how many people feel their time and attention are being wasted. And what seems more disturbing is the lack of transparency.