By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to a whistleblower complaint, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) placed the personal data of millions of Americans, including Social Security numbers, on a vulnerable server in June. The complaint, filed by the Social Security Administration’s chief data officer, Charles Borges, alleges multiple violations and a “substantial and specific threat to public health and safety.” The database, known as Numident, contains sensitive information making it a target for nefarious actors. Despite warnings of “catastrophic impact” and a high-risk assessment, the data was moved to a private cloud server with limited oversight.
Read the original article here
DOGE put Social Security numbers and other data on a risky serve whistleblower alleges, and honestly, are we really surprised? This whole situation, if true, feels like a predictable consequence of certain decisions and actions. It’s like watching a train wreck in slow motion, knowing all the while that there’s no chance of stopping it.
The absurd scale of this is almost unbelievable, isn’t it? We’re talking about a potential breach involving the identifying information of over 300 million Americans. That’s not just a minor security lapse; that’s potentially a data goldmine ripe for exploitation. The whistleblower’s allegations, if verified, paint a picture of stunning negligence, if not outright malfeasance. It’s chilling to think about the implications: everything from identity theft to more sinister forms of data manipulation.
It’s easy to feel a sense of outrage, to feel like the whistleblower, Borges, might be facing consequences for bringing this to light, and that’s a real tragedy. We’re reminded of the quote, “It’s not about who has the most bombs. It’s who controls the information.” This is a critical piece of our modern society. Control of sensitive data means immense power, and we’re potentially seeing a flagrant disregard for that responsibility. The idea that this data could have been routed through a Starlink system to who knows where… the potential for misuse and abuse is frightening.
This entire DOGE situation is reminiscent of a movie plot, almost too on-the-nose to be true. We should all be locking down our credit accounts, contacting the credit reporting agencies, and taking every possible measure to safeguard our personal information. We can’t trust these people to keep our info safe, if the allegations are to be believed.
The request for the NUMIDENT database, containing all the information from Social Security card applications, is a red flag. This database holds everything: names, dates and places of birth, citizenship status, racial and ethnic information, parents’ names, and, crucially, the Social Security numbers themselves. The potential for misuse of such a treasure trove of data is vast.
It’s not just about negligence; it seems like the potential for financial gain and control was always the driving force. The ability to steal such a trove of data from US citizens has created something that can never be matched by anyone else. The movie “Sneakers” still holds up as a cautionary tale, as it shows us the value of information.
The reactions of some, who seem to confuse wealth and a perceived sense of genius with actual competence and responsibility, are perhaps the most disheartening part of this whole mess. There’s a certain disconnect between these people’s perception of themselves and the reality of the consequences of their actions. It’s a clear indicator of a broken system, one that prioritizes wealth and celebrity above genuine ethical conduct.
From a security standpoint, it’s negligent to have a file containing sensitive data on almost the entire US population. The whole DOGE operation, and Elon’s alleged meddling in it, appear to be driven by nefarious intentions. The potential for widespread damage is enormous, as is the potential for an erosion of public trust.
The irony, and the tragedy, is that those who could have acted responsibly to prevent this from happening have failed. It’s a clear indication of the kind of people who are at the forefront of our technology and innovation. If these allegations are true, this entire episode will become another example of the disastrous consequences of putting unchecked power and trust into the hands of those who have no regard for the people they’re supposed to be serving.