By John Q. Hosedrinker 
With a perceived lack of leadership from congressional figures, Democrats are increasingly turning to their state governors for direction and strength. Governors like Gavin Newsom, JB Pritzker, and Kathy Hochul are stepping up to confront Republicans and take action, a stark contrast to the perceived inaction of congressional leaders. This shift is driven by a belief that governors can more readily enact change and are seen as distinct from the often-disliked D.C. “bubble.” This strategy of focusing on state-level victories and leveraging the accomplishments of executive leaders could be a key part of the Democrats’ efforts to regain political power and momentum, with several governors already gaining national attention and support.
Read the original article here
Democrats inspired by Newsom, Pritzker look to states, not Congress. It seems the current political landscape is shifting, and the focus is turning away from the gridlock of Congress and toward the dynamism of state leadership. With the federal government seemingly paralyzed by division, many Democrats are finding themselves looking to governors like Gavin Newsom of California and J.B. Pritzker of Illinois for inspiration and action. This isn’t just a tactical shift; it reflects a growing sentiment that states represent a more effective avenue for enacting progressive policies and pushing back against perceived federal overreach.
This move toward state-level influence is understandable. The reality is that Congressional Democrats often find themselves hamstrung. The structure of the federal government, the filibuster, and the influence of special interests all contribute to a situation where meaningful change can be incredibly difficult to achieve. Talking to a wall is a common metaphor for the conversations they might be having in Washington. In contrast, governors have more direct power within their respective states. They can enact policies, sign legislation, and mobilize resources in ways that Congress often struggles to replicate.
The appeal of state-level action is also driven by the current political climate. There’s a sense that the country is deeply divided, and the stakes are high. In this environment, governors who can take decisive action and offer a clear vision for their states are seen as vital. It’s even being suggested that Newsom and Pritzker could be potential candidates for the 2028 presidential race, with the winner perhaps selecting the other as their running mate. This highlights the growing belief that governors can be effective national leaders, particularly in an era of political polarization.
Furthermore, there’s an argument that the constant focus on Washington has been a detriment to the Democratic Party for decades. The feeling is that the electorate is tired of Washington insiders and the status quo. Governors, who are closer to the people and can demonstrate tangible results, are seen as a welcome alternative. It is a different kind of power; a chief executive with more sway within their city-state.
Of course, state-level action isn’t without its limitations. Governors are still constrained by their state legislatures, and the policies they enact are ultimately subject to the laws of the state. Moreover, the Supreme Court can, and often does, review state-level actions, which can significantly impact their influence. However, within their states, governors have considerable power, and that influence is being embraced by those Democrats searching for action.
It’s also worth noting that this shift to state-level focus isn’t a complete abandonment of the federal government. It’s more of a strategic realignment. Democrats still need to win at the federal level to pass nationwide legislation. But as the current gridlock shows, the states offer a way to push forward in the short term.
The shift to state-level leadership is not without its challenges. Governors who are seen as too progressive or who are out of step with the values of their constituents may face a political backlash. But as the gridlock in Washington persists, and the desire for action remains, it’s clear that states will continue to play a critical role in shaping the future of the Democratic Party and the country.