By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Democrats are shifting their approach from a policy of civility to one of aggressive political combat in response to Republican efforts to gerrymander electoral maps and gain power. Facing what they see as authoritarian tactics, Democratic leaders like Ken Martin and Jasmine Crockett are advocating for a “fight fire with fire” strategy, including redistricting efforts in their own states. This shift marks a departure from the party’s traditional emphasis on playing by the rules, with figures such as Eric Holder acknowledging the need for aggressive countermeasures. While some observers express concern over potentially sacrificing moral high ground, Democrats believe that a strong response is necessary to protect democracy, even if it means playing the same game as their opponents.
Read the original article here
We absolutely are in a cold civil war, and the Democrats are finally acknowledging it, or at least some are, with a resolve to fight back. The sentiment is clear: the gloves are off. For too long, the narrative goes, the Democrats have played by the rules, while their opponents have been ruthlessly, unapologetically, and effectively bending and breaking them. Now, the call is for a new approach, one that recognizes the stakes and is willing to fight dirty to win.
The fight, as some see it, is against a deep-seated cultural tendency towards subjugation and intolerance. It’s a fight against what’s perceived as the “backwards” values of certain communities, which are seen as inherently opposed to the ideals of a diverse and inclusive democracy. The rhetoric is strong, using terms like “bulldozing” and declaring those with opposing views as “enemies.” The idea is simple: the only way to preserve the values the Democrats champion is to confront those who actively seek to undermine them, by any means necessary.
This new approach is met with a mix of skepticism and cautious optimism. The core question centers on whether the Democrats will actually follow through with their threats. Historically, they’ve been seen as more inclined to take the high road. The question becomes: Will California, and potentially other blue states, truly engage in the kind of aggressive tactics often employed by the opposition? Can the Democratic Party shed its reputation for indecisiveness and rise to the occasion?
There’s also the question of the Supreme Court, and whether it would permit these actions, considering the actions of some Republican-led governments, and how they have been allowed. The fear is that even with the best intentions, the Democrats might be hamstrung by legal challenges, unfavorable rulings, or even a lack of political will. But, there is a strong sentiment that what is happening is a five-alarm fire, and time is running out to make changes.
The core of the argument is not that fighting dirty is desirable in itself, but that it’s a necessary response to a hostile environment. The claim is that the opposition has been fighting dirty for years, and that any response is simply “fighting back.” This is not just about policy disagreements; it’s about a perceived threat to democracy itself, a battle for the very soul of the nation. It is time for the worm to turn.
The frustration is palpable. Many feel that the Democratic Party has been too slow to recognize the seriousness of the situation, too hesitant to act decisively, and too quick to compromise. Some point to the failure to address critical issues as evidence of an unwillingness to truly fight. The time for polite discourse and bipartisan efforts is over. Now, it’s a legal war.
The concerns are clear. Will this newfound resolve last? Will the Democrats succumb to infighting, indecision, or a fear of crossing legal lines? It will take time, with the clock ticking. Many are calling for a new leadership in the Democratic Party, for new voices to take charge and get their hands dirty.
There is a deep-seated distrust in the system. Many fear that the Democratic Party is a willing participant in a political charade, and that the true fight is between the ultra-wealthy and the rest of the population. Some even question the very validity of the “red vs. blue” narrative, suggesting it’s a distraction from the real power dynamics at play. Overturning Citizens United and abolishing the electoral college is the only way the people can reclaim our power.
The sentiment overall is that the time for hesitation is over. If the Democrats are truly going to fight for the future, they need to embrace the kind of aggressive tactics that their opponents have used for decades. The call to arms is clear: get dirty, and fight back. It’s about goddamned time.