By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Amidst escalating plans to militarize more US cities, a leading Democrat accused Donald Trump of manufacturing a crisis to justify sending federalized National Guard troops into Chicago, over the objections of local leaders. The White House has reportedly been working on these plans, while the mayor of Chicago and the governor of Illinois both stated they had not requested federal assistance. Trump has stated that the people of Chicago are “screaming” for assistance, despite statistics showing a decline in serious crime in the city.
Read the original article here
The core of this issue revolves around the allegation that Donald Trump is deliberately creating a crisis to justify deploying the National Guard to Chicago. This assertion, voiced by a leading Democrat, suggests a calculated effort to exploit the perception of rising crime for political gain. The claim is that Trump is manufacturing a problem where one doesn’t exist, or at the very least, exaggerating its severity, to enable the use of emergency powers.
The immediate and most prominent reaction to this potential deployment is a sense of deep unease and resentment from Chicagoans themselves. Many residents express a feeling of safety within their city and believe that the presence of the military is unwarranted and unwelcome. The underlying sentiment is that this is an overreach, a solution in search of a problem, and a blatant disregard for the city’s autonomy. The sentiment is amplified by reports of crime being down in the city.
The suspicion that this is a manufactured crisis extends beyond mere political maneuvering. There’s a fear that such a move is a calculated step towards an authoritarian agenda. The narrative evokes historical parallels, specifically the rise of fascism, suggesting that this is a means of quelling dissent, controlling populations, and solidifying power. The comparison to historical events, such as the Reichstag fire, paints a stark picture of potentially destabilizing events and power grabs.
There is a strong sense that Trump is using this as a distraction from more pressing matters, particularly his past, and potentially present, transgressions. The focus is on the Epstein files and other damaging pieces of information that could damage his reputation.
Moreover, it’s argued that the deployment, if it happens, is not just unnecessary but also likely to be counterproductive. The experiences of the military deployed to other locations in the past, such as Washington D.C. and Los Angeles, show that the troops are left without a clear mission and purpose, leading to wasted resources and an increased burden on taxpayers. The idea that these are political moves disguised as security measures is widespread.
The proposed action is seen as unconstitutional. The invocation of the Posse Comitatus Act, along with the reminder of the core principles of liberty and the right to bear arms, highlights the perceived threat to fundamental American values.
The focus on Chicago is seen as a deliberate choice, as it is a city with a predominantly Democratic population. Some speculate that Trump’s aim is not to fight crime but to provoke a reaction that would provide justification for further action. This is where it can be viewed as a cynical ploy to create division and to paint “liberal cities” in a negative light.
The broader context of this potential action must include cities like Baltimore, which has recorded significant decreases in violent crime. The facts on the ground seem to contradict the claims of a widespread crisis. The fact that Trump is seemingly focused on Democratic-led cities, while ignoring the crime rates of red states, adds fuel to the argument that these actions are politically motivated.
Finally, there is the cynical possibility that the intention is to create a spectacle rather than solve a problem. Trump may deploy the troops in a highly visible area, like the Loop or near Trump Tower, for the sake of appearances. The ultimate implication is that these actions are not driven by a genuine concern for public safety but by the ambition to exert power, manipulate public perception, and further his political agenda. The hope is that Chicagoans will not take the bait and disrupt these political endeavors.