By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Once staunch defenders of free enterprise, conservative business groups are largely silent regarding Donald Trump’s actions to control private businesses. These groups, such as the US Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable, which previously criticized government overreach, have remained quiet despite Trump’s interventions like demanding a cut of Nvidia’s China sales and considering a government stake in Intel. The president’s actions, including public criticism of CEOs and unorthodox arrangements, have created an environment where businesses fear retribution for dissent, opting to wait for promised tax cuts instead. This silence highlights a shift in the risk calculus for corporations under Trump’s administration.
Read the original article here
Corporate America is silent as Trump abandons free-market principles, and it’s a silence that speaks volumes.
The core of the issue is this: corporations, especially the powerful ones that wield significant influence, have always prioritized their profits above all else. The facade of “free market” principles often served as a convenient smokescreen. It allowed them to advocate for deregulation and tax cuts, all while simultaneously lobbying for protections and advantages that benefited their bottom lines, frequently at the expense of smaller businesses and consumers. What we’re seeing isn’t a betrayal of principles because, in reality, many of these corporations never truly embraced them. They prefer a system where they can operate with minimal competition, dictating terms and maximizing profits. It’s classic “ruthless capitalism for everyone else, socialism for us.”
The current situation isn’t about a sudden abandonment of free-market ideals; it’s about the unveiling of a long-held reality. Trump’s actions, which include government intervention in the market, selective favoritism, and the potential for coercion, are a direct challenge to the principles of a free market. But the response from the business community, the very group that historically championed those principles, has been largely muted. Where are the condemnations? Where are the lawsuits? Why the deafening silence? The answer, unfortunately, is quite clear: corporate America has assessed the situation and concluded that their interests are best served by aligning with the powerful, even if that means sacrificing their supposed ideological commitments.
The silence stems from a confluence of factors. One is the fear of retaliation. Trump has shown a willingness to target and punish those who criticize him. Any CEO who dares to speak out risks a social media barrage, regulatory scrutiny, or worse. This is the classic playbook of authoritarian regimes: silence dissent through intimidation. Another critical factor is the perceived opportunity for financial gain. Trump’s policies, while often detrimental to the overall economy, can create specific winners. Some corporations are likely hoping to benefit from preferential treatment, tax breaks, or exemptions from regulations. They are calculating that the long-term damage to the market is a worthwhile price to pay for short-term gains.
This trend isn’t new; it’s simply been laid bare by the current political climate. Corporations have always been willing to compromise on their principles to achieve their goals. The difference now is that the price of doing so has become increasingly clear: the erosion of democratic norms and the concentration of power in the hands of a few. The silence of corporate America is not merely an absence of words; it’s an endorsement of a system where cronyism and corruption thrive, where the rules are bent to serve the powerful, and where the public interest takes a backseat to corporate profits.
It’s important to remember that the narrative of a free market is often selectively applied. While corporations advocate for deregulation in certain areas, they simultaneously seek government protection and subsidies. The reality is that many corporations want to be shielded from competition while still being able to benefit from a free market. The current environment is one where corporations hope to operate as the leaders of the industry in a market where they have an advantage, but where they also will be shielded from the negatives of said market.
The true irony here is that those who have long railed against government overreach are now conspicuously silent as the government actively intervenes in the market. The US Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable, for instance, have been vocal critics of regulations and tax increases under previous administrations. Yet, they have remained largely quiet in the face of Trump’s actions, which represent a far more direct assault on free enterprise. This contrast highlights the hypocrisy at the heart of corporate America’s approach to politics.
This situation exposes the fundamental incompatibility between unchecked capitalism and democracy. Ultimately, corporate cronyism and the rise of fascism are the inevitable results of a system that prioritizes profit above all else. The current trend is not an anomaly but a reflection of what happens when the pursuit of wealth eclipses all other values. It’s a harsh lesson, but one that, hopefully, will lead to a re-evaluation of how corporate power and the principles of a truly free market are defined. Perhaps, a re-evaluation of where we go from here.