By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is set to sign an executive order this Saturday, outlining the city’s resistance to a planned immigration crackdown by the Trump administration. The order will instruct city agencies, including law enforcement, not to collaborate with federal agents on immigration enforcement activities. This move comes in response to threats from the federal government and planned operations, including the potential deployment of the National Guard, which Governor JB Pritzker has described as an abuse of power. With increased federal enforcement expected, the city intends to utilize all legal and legislative options to counter the planned efforts.
Read the original article here
Chicago mayor to sign executive order directing city to resist Trump’s immigration raids. It’s a move that’s stirring up a lot of feelings, and understandably so. The core idea here is simple: the city is essentially saying “no” to cooperating with federal immigration enforcement, and that’s a pretty big deal.
The whole concept of states’ rights gets brought up, and the tenth amendment to the Constitution is mentioned. It’s a reminder of the balance of power, and how this kind of executive order touches on that. The fact that some people see this as a positive step, while others are already predicting legal challenges, really highlights the complexity of the issue. Some people are already seeing this as the first step toward something bigger, hoping it will spread to other cities.
There’s a palpable sense of urgency in some of the comments. One person even brought up the idea of traffic delays near military bases as a way to make things difficult for federal agents. This is a striking demonstration of the lengths some people are willing to go to resist. It’s clear there’s a lot of emotion tied up in this topic. People are clearly divided by their political beliefs, and how they view the potential outcomes.
There are some dark predictions, too, with concerns about the potential for arrests and even threats to the mayor. The sheer intensity of some of these comments highlights the level of distrust and fear that some people are experiencing. It’s a reflection of the heightened political climate and the deep divisions within the country.
Some people are clearly supportive of this move, wishing they lived in Chicago and echoing sentiments of hope for a more resistant stance against federal actions. They’re focusing on the idea of non-cooperation as a form of resistance. It sounds like the order will direct city police to avoid collaboration with federal law enforcement on immigration matters. The idea of refusing service to ICE agents is also suggested, as a further measure.
However, the practicalities are also raised. The federal government’s power to enforce immigration laws is noted, and the fact that federal law often supersedes local laws is pointed out. Some point out that a state’s role when facing federal power isn’t entirely clear, and the details of the legal challenges this may face are not well defined. There are some realistic views that see this as potentially running up against Supreme Court precedents.
The discussion also touched on the nature of “resistance” itself, with the distinction made between non-cooperation and actual interference with federal law enforcement. It’s a crucial difference, as interfering could lead to real legal consequences. The general consensus, it appears, is that non-cooperation is generally legal, but resistance, which can mean interfering, can be illegal.
There is also the idea that Democrats need to get more creative in their resistance efforts. The need for more proactive measures, beyond simple denunciation, is also evident. There’s a sense that waiting for the situation to improve isn’t enough, and that more direct action is necessary. The contrast between this approach and other cities’ responses to similar situations is mentioned, with suggestions that other cities should take similar steps.
There is also a strong, immediate call to action, urging people to take to the streets. Calls for neighborhood watch groups and using social media apps to monitor and report unusual activity are mentioned. There’s a feeling that the stakes are high, and that this is a fight that will be taken all the way.