Canadian visitation to Montana is declining, with a 33% decrease in June following a 38% drop in May, according to Forbes. Montana officials, like Glacier Country CEO Racene Friede, confirm the decline, noting decreases at all ports of entry, such as a 24.76% drop at the Del Bonita port. Credit card spending data also reflects this trend, with a 37% monthly decrease in Kalispell and a 25% drop in Whitefish, prompting a marketing campaign to attract Canadian visitors.

Read the original article here

Canadian visits to the U.S. dropped by a significant 33% in June, a statistic that’s sending ripples throughout the tourism industry, particularly in states like Montana, which heavily relies on Canadian visitors. This decline isn’t just a number; it represents fewer tourists spending money in local businesses, less revenue for the state, and a palpable shift in the atmosphere of popular tourist destinations.

It’s understandable to wonder what could cause such a dramatic decrease. The answer, in many respects, seems to be tied to the political climate and rhetoric emanating from the United States. The focus on border security, talk of annexation, and the overall tone directed towards Canada and its citizens has undeniably played a role. When the idea of a country being a potential 51st state is floated, it’s no surprise that anxieties rise, and travel plans get reconsidered. Why visit a place where your country’s sovereignty is seemingly being questioned?

This downturn is especially impactful in places like Montana, where the shared border with Canada and the strong ties built over generations fostered a healthy tourist trade. The Canadian marketing campaign launched by a company that aims to let Canadians know “that we miss them, that we don’t think of them as a target market, we think of them as neighbors, friends, family” is the type of proactive measure that speaks volumes about the challenges faced. It’s a stark reminder of the economic realities and how international relations can quickly impact business prospects.

The motivations of Canadians not to travel south of the border are easy to understand. Concerns extend beyond the rhetoric to the reality of the treatment of immigrants and the erosion of rights within the US. The reports of harsh conditions and treatment in detention centers, along with the overall political environment, create a climate that isn’t conducive to leisurely travel, let alone family vacations. It makes sense that people are wary of putting themselves or their families in a position where they might feel unwelcome, or even unsafe.

Some people might argue that there’s an upside for the American economy. However, the reality is much more nuanced. The focus has shifted from seeing neighbors to perhaps seeing people that are not welcome, and some Americans seem to be more concerned with making a statement than welcoming guests. There is an argument to be made that some segments of the population are okay with the economic impact, as long as it aligns with their political goals.

The economic impact is real, from Montana to other border states and beyond, the loss of Canadian tourists translates to lost revenue for hotels, restaurants, shops, and various other businesses that depend on visitor spending. The tourism industries and local economies of the state have already noticed this is a problem.

What’s interesting is the potential for this trend to accelerate. Some sources suggest that the decline could be even more significant than the reported 33%. The situation’s evolving nature means the effects could deepen in the coming months, particularly if political tensions remain.

Ultimately, this scenario shows how closely interconnected global politics and economics are. The rhetoric used, the policies pursued, and the treatment of foreign nationals all have a direct impact on the choices people make, including whether or not to spend their vacation time in the United States. It’s a lesson that should resonate with anyone involved in the tourism industry, and anyone who believes in building bridges with other countries.