Number of Canadian tourists visiting New Hampshire is down 30% this year, according to officials, and it’s a topic that definitely sparks some strong reactions. Honestly, it’s a bit surprising that the drop isn’t even more significant, considering the current climate. There’s a sense that things could be a lot worse, and some believe it’s only a matter of time before the numbers really take a nosedive.

The reasons behind this decline are varied, and officials are hesitant to pinpoint a single cause. Some point to strained relations between the U.S. and Canada, while others suggest it could be a mix of factors like economics, gas prices, and even simple weather patterns. The sentiment is, the “powers that be” might be intentionally missing the obvious: the current political landscape is a major deterrent.

There’s a feeling that some people are simply not making the connection between the political situation and their travel plans. It’s like they have blinders on, unable to see the impact of current events. Why would you want to visit a place where the government’s policies are so clearly at odds with your values? Some go so far as to say they wouldn’t go to the U.S. even if they were paid, highlighting the depth of feeling on this issue.

The decrease in tourism is expected to hit certain sectors harder than others. While some travel, like visiting family or attending specific events, may be less affected, the impact on “tourist attraction tourism” is likely to be more pronounced. The concern is that this isn’t just about leisure travel; it also includes essential work-related trips. As the political situation continues to evolve, some predict that the numbers could decline even further. It’s a bit like waiting for the other shoe to drop, with the real impact potentially being felt next year.

The discussion shifts to the emotional aspects of the issue, with some openly admitting that they used to visit New Hampshire regularly but now wouldn’t consider it. The general feeling is that the U.S. is becoming a place to be avoided. The atmosphere has seemingly become toxic, and it’s hard to see why anyone would willingly choose to spend time there.

The irony isn’t lost on anyone that the very people who are complaining about the decrease in tourism are often the ones who support the policies that are causing the problem. It’s as if some are living in a bubble, detached from reality and unable to see the consequences of their choices.

This drop in tourism is more than just a number. The conversation acknowledges that tourism is an essential part of the New Hampshire economy. It’s clear the impact will be felt, particularly in areas that depend heavily on tourism. The fear is not only for the immediate future but for the long-term perception of the U.S. as a welcoming and safe destination.

Some even point out the hypocrisy. A significant number of Americans, even those who might call themselves patriots, are often the ones who are creating the very conditions that are driving away tourists. There’s also a sense of frustration with the media and its reluctance to directly address the elephant in the room: the political climate and the ongoing actions of certain figures.

It’s a clear statement that Canadians, and potentially other international visitors, will continue to stay away as long as the political situation remains volatile. The suggestion is that the current government must change for things to improve. The tone is one of exasperation, frustration, and a deep-seated sense that the U.S. is currently shooting itself in the foot.

Even the seemingly simple question of gas prices becomes a point of contention. The sarcasm is palpable when considering if cheaper gas could somehow attract tourists back. The reality, as it’s being portrayed, is that the political climate far outweighs the impact of a few cents at the pump.

The consensus is clear: the U.S. is facing a crisis of perception. The country’s reputation has been damaged, and regaining the trust of potential visitors will be a long and challenging process. The feeling is that it will take more than just a change in leadership to repair the damage; it may also take a fundamental shift in attitude and policy. This current attitude is not going to change, even with some economic benefits.

The broader sentiment is that the U.S. is experiencing a self-inflicted wound. With such harsh words and sentiments against the country, it’s a situation that many see as entirely avoidable. If the U.S. wants to see a recovery in tourism, it has a long way to go.