By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to a poll conducted by Governor Newsom’s pollster, his proposal for redistricting in California, which aims to create five new Democratic congressional seats, has overwhelming support with 57% of voters in favor. Newsom has called for a special election on the new maps. The plan has drawn opposition from Republicans. If approved, the redistricting would impact California’s congressional delegation, potentially shifting the balance in the House of Representatives, with the plan’s fate dependent on the state legislature’s vote to place the measure before voters.
Read the original article here
California redistricting vote begins with overwhelming support, Newsom pollster says. This is pretty big news, and it seems like a lot of people are fired up about it. The initial numbers are impressive, with a significant majority of California voters, around 57%, backing the proposal. The opposition, at 35%, is certainly present but doesn’t seem to be enough to stop this from moving forward.
The core of the issue is how California’s congressional districts are drawn. Right now, the state sends 43 Democrats and 9 Republicans to Congress. The proposed redistricting, which aims to create new districts that are more favorable to Democrats, could shift the balance significantly, potentially boosting the Democrats’ advantage to 48 seats compared to just 5 for Republicans. People are clearly excited about the possibility of rebalancing the scales and potentially offsetting perceived power grabs by other states.
The sentiment is overwhelmingly supportive. Many are hoping that other Democratic-leaning states will follow California’s lead. The phrase “fight fire with an inferno” seems to capture a lot of the energy surrounding this move. There’s a feeling that the rules of the game have changed, and it’s time for Democrats to play hardball too. The underlying concern is the perceived threat to democracy, and the feeling that drastic measures are necessary to counter it.
Of course, this sort of change also raises some thorny questions. There are worries about whether this is the right way to go and whether it’s playing into the same tactics that are being criticized. Some people are worried that the Supreme Court might intervene and block California’s efforts, while allowing similar moves in other states to stand. There’s also the argument that this is simply a necessary step to even the playing field.
The overall tone, however, is one of resolute action. The frustration with what is perceived as undemocratic behavior from the opposing side is palpable. The hope is that these redistricting efforts, in conjunction with other potential legislative changes, like the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, could lead to a more balanced and fair political landscape, ideally one where voters pick their politicians, rather than the other way around.
There’s a clear recognition that these are complex issues, with no easy answers. The prospect of a “gerrymandering arms race” is not lost on anyone, but the perceived stakes – the very survival of democracy – are considered so high that some see no other option. People are already getting mailers arguing against the proposal, but the pro-side seems to be far more energized. The sentiment that it’s time to “save what’s left of the democracy by any means necessary” seems to be quite strong.
There’s also a willingness to meet fire with fire and not get too bogged down in being “nice”. And it’s clear that the idea that redistricting is a tool to be used by any party, and the desire to maximize the potential impact of the redistricting, shows a change in mindset. Many would be delighted to see a 52-0 split in favor of the Democrats, but anything to rebalance the situation would be considered a win.
The whole conversation highlights just how polarized the political landscape has become, and how deep the divisions run. On one side, the supporters are ready to fight, while the opposition is gearing up to resist. The debate comes down to the very heart of how the country is run and who gets to run it.
The comments about the math, 43+9=52 and 48+5=53, probably just highlight a typo or a misunderstanding. The excitement and the underlying fear of this moment are very clear. It’s a moment that has sparked a lot of debate and a lot of strong feelings, and it’s a big deal for everyone involved.