By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent ruling, a federal bankruptcy judge denied anti-government activist Ammon Bundy the ability to discharge a $52 million civil judgment through bankruptcy. The judge sided with St. Luke’s Health System, determining that Bundy’s actions in defaming the hospital network were “willful and malicious,” a key factor preventing debt discharge. This decision stems from Bundy’s 2022 claims that St. Luke’s was involved in child trafficking, accusations that led to the original defamation lawsuit and a default judgment against him. The court cited Bundy’s failure to engage in the initial Idaho trial as a factor in the ruling, effectively upholding the original judgment and preventing him from avoiding accountability through bankruptcy.
Read the original article here
Federal judge: Ammon Bundy must pay $52 million civil court judgment, and the first thing that pops into my mind is, well, he probably won’t. It’s a pretty common expectation, actually, considering past behavior. We’re talking about a hefty sum, and history suggests a strong possibility of defiance. The situation brings to mind the Proud Boys and their history of non-compliance with court rulings.
Federal judge: Ammon Bundy must pay $52 million civil court judgment, and honestly, there’s a distinct feeling that any sense of accountability is going to be sidestepped. I can’t help but think about how this might play out. He’ll likely try to rally support, possibly using platforms like GiveSendGo to solicit donations. There’s even a somewhat cynical anticipation of income from unconventional sources, like the resale of items. It’s a pattern that’s been observed before, and it doesn’t exactly inspire confidence in a timely or complete payment.
Federal judge: Ammon Bundy must pay $52 million civil court judgment, and the potential involvement of certain figures also comes to mind. It’s hard to ignore the speculation about potential pardons or interventions that could complicate the situation. This is because some see these kinds of actions as protecting individuals who are not held to the same standards as everyone else. The justice system and how it’s perceived is at the center of this. It’s not just about the immediate consequences; it’s also about the perceived fairness of the system.
Federal judge: Ammon Bundy must pay $52 million civil court judgment, and it’s natural to question how the ruling will be enforced. Will there be wage garnishment, asset seizure, or other measures? The mechanics of collecting such a substantial debt are complex and may be further complicated by any attempts to hide or shield assets. There is also the likelihood of scrutiny from the IRS, and a close look at his tax filings.
Federal judge: Ammon Bundy must pay $52 million civil court judgment, and I think about the ways people try to avoid consequences. The history of moving assets to protect them is a key aspect. It’s a familiar tactic, and it underscores the lengths some individuals will go to avoid fulfilling their obligations. The timing of these transfers, potentially occurring before the initial court appearance, is a crucial detail.
Federal judge: Ammon Bundy must pay $52 million civil court judgment, and what is also at play here, are the legal and political dynamics. It’s likely there will be appeals, and possibly even bankruptcy filings. The civil nature of the judgment means it’s not subject to presidential pardon, at least in the way some may think. This adds another layer to the analysis of how this will unfold.
Federal judge: Ammon Bundy must pay $52 million civil court judgment, and it highlights a broader issue. It’s about the perception of justice, and whether there is an adherence to it for everyone, regardless of their background or connections. The history of the Bundy family, particularly the armed standoffs and the occupation of federal buildings, is a significant backdrop. This history influences how the public views the current situation and expectations of the outcome.
Federal judge: Ammon Bundy must pay $52 million civil court judgment, and the potential long-term implications are worth thinking about. The potential for a former president or the current administration to become involved adds another layer to the story, particularly with how they have treated things in the past. It’s interesting to consider the parallels to other high-profile cases, such as Alex Jones and the Sandy Hook victims. The ability to get away with defying the courts and the consequences of such behavior are also relevant.
Federal judge: Ammon Bundy must pay $52 million civil court judgment, and it’s important to consider the details of the underlying events that led to this judgment. The armed confrontations with federal agents and the occupation of federal property are central to this matter. These actions have had a lasting impact and have raised serious questions about respect for the law. The legal ramifications of these events continue to unfold.
Federal judge: Ammon Bundy must pay $52 million civil court judgment, and so it seems safe to say that the road ahead will be a complicated one. With the history of defiance and asset protection, enforcing this judgment will be a challenge. The involvement of political figures, the potential for appeals and bankruptcy filings, and the broader context of accountability will shape the course of this case. It’s going to be interesting to see how this plays out.