By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Violence erupted in Mexico’s senate following a heated discussion concerning the presence of foreign troops. Opposition leader Alejandro “Alito” Moreno initiated a physical altercation with senate president Gerardo Fernández Noroña, escalating to include shoving and grabbing. The incident unfolded after a contentious debate where the ruling party accused the opposition of inviting US military intervention, a claim the opposition denied. In response to the violence, the senate leader plans to propose expelling Moreno and other lawmakers and has filed a criminal complaint.
Read the original article here
Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels. It’s pretty clear this isn’t just about the cartels, although they’re undoubtedly a huge problem. This whole situation seems to be a complex web of competing interests, corruption, and national pride, all tangled up in the debate over whether or not the US should send in its military.
Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels. It’s easy to see how someone could be against the cartels, wanting them gone from the country, but also be against what they might see as an invasion by a foreign military. These aren’t mutually exclusive positions. I mean, you can want to protect your country from both the cartels and the potential interference of another country’s military.
Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels. The idea that competing cartels might have political allies, using the US intervention as a way to get rid of their rivals, is a thought that certainly adds another layer of complexity. Maybe some cartels see an opportunity to use the US to their advantage. This could explain some of the tension and the heated words being exchanged between different parties.
Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels. It really feels like this goes deeper than just the drug cartels, doesn’t it? It’s probably about deep-seated corruption. It sounds like the history of the country is full of it. It doesn’t look like a simple operation, a quick fix, like the previous administration seemed to think. The anger and heated discussions we’re seeing are probably about a multitude of factors.
Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels. The US military intervening… it’s a slippery slope, right? They’ve made remarks about other neighboring countries and are still acting strange about Greenland. Would you really want them meddling in your backyard? Also, if the cartels have any sense, they’ll just move operations if things get too hot. The US military intervening in another country without being invited feels like a declaration of war.
Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels. The Mexican government isn’t helping matters, is it? The Mexican government is utterly corrupt. This is likely a situation where people are getting paid off to look the other way. The US doesn’t even have to enter the equation. However, given the history of the “War on Drugs”, this seems like something that isn’t going to work well.
Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels. It is a certainty that the cartels are far more deeply ingrained and better equipped than people realize. The cartels are a cancer, spreading everywhere, their operations diversified. Will the US be able to win? My gut says this could turn into another Afghanistan. The cartels have a better fighting chance.
Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels. The passionate defense of their borders by the Mexican government is something to respect. But if the Mexican government was as passionate about destroying the cartels as they are about keeping the US out, things might actually improve.
Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels. The cartels are a multinational problem. They just move their operations if one country becomes too difficult to operate in. It’s whack-a-mole. Unfortunately, the Mexican government hasn’t been able to defeat the cartels in the past, even with external help. Given the current state of affairs, is there a realistic solution other than US intervention?
Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels. You have to wonder, aren’t some of the people in that room getting paid by the cartels? It seems like the perfect opportunity for the country’s enemies to exploit them. Also, the idea of regime-change tactics is another layer to consider. In a situation like this, are the people actually going to take action? Or are they more concerned with the bigger picture?
Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels. The President in Mexico was allegedly put in power by the cartels, because of their soft approach. The cartels are often winning the battles and it seems like the only time a cartel leader is arrested is when the US gets involved. The government has been complacent and it has gotten them where they are today.
Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels. As long as Americans are spending billions on illegal drugs, there will be cartels supplying them. As a society, we need to think about the root cause. The war on drugs hasn’t worked. We need to focus on the demand, as well as the supply. The cartels aren’t just going to disappear.
Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels. The US needs to stay out of Mexico. The cartels are a problem, but the idea of Trump, of all people, launching a military intervention into the country is a difficult one to accept. You can hate the cartels and still hate the idea of US military involvement.