By John Q. Hosedrinker 
After a contentious period marked by denied access to the town hall and legal battles, Patrick Braxton has overwhelmingly won re-election as mayor of Newbern, Alabama. This victory concludes a dispute stemming from 2020 when Braxton was prevented from serving after running unopposed. The election, a result of a federal settlement, signifies a return to democratic governance after decades of appointed officials and an overwhelmingly white government in a town where Black residents are the majority. Braxton’s triumph, with 66 votes to his opponent’s 26, is seen as a resounding endorsement of his leadership and a clear statement of the town’s desires.
Read the original article here
Alabama town’s first Black mayor, who had been locked out of office, wins election, a sentence that immediately grabs your attention. It’s a story that could be ripped straight from the headlines of a bygone era, yet, unbelievably, it’s happening in 2025. The sheer audacity of it – the blatant disregard for the democratic process, the obvious undertones of racial prejudice – leaves you stunned. It’s difficult to fathom the lengths to which some will go to hold onto power, especially when that power seems to be steeped in historical injustice.
The fact that this mayor ran unopposed in 2020 is a detail that highlights the deep-seated resistance he faced. They locked him out, literally preventing him from fulfilling his duties, a clear act of defiance against the will of the people. Then, he ran again, and won again. It’s a testament to his resilience and the unwavering support he must have received from his community. One can only hope that this time, the barriers finally crumble, and he’s allowed to serve the people who elected him. It’s baffling that in this day and age, a situation like this even exists, but the story serves as a harsh reminder that the fight for equality and justice is far from over.
One wonders about the systemic issues at play in this small Alabama town. The “hand-me-down” system of public offices, where the mayor appoints the town council, and the town council then appoints the mayor, is a blatant example of how power can be concentrated and manipulated. It’s a corrupt system that breeds stagnation and reinforces the status quo, hindering any chance of progress or diverse leadership. It seems almost unbelievable that a setup like this, which essentially shuts out meaningful democratic participation, could have persisted for so long.
It’s mind-boggling that something like this was allowed to persist for so long without legal challenges. The article even mentions that the town hadn’t held an election since the 1960s – a truly astonishing revelation. One can’t help but question the legal framework that allowed this to continue for so many years. The very fact that it took so long for the situation to come to a head is a testament to the power of entrenched interests and the pervasiveness of prejudice.
Given the context, it’s not surprising that the idea of a mayor for a town with only 133 people raises questions. It’s a contrast to the modern world, where people live in bustling apartment complexes. However, the rural nature of these situations offers a different perspective. It highlights the disparities between urban and rural communities in the U.S., and the unique challenges that these smaller towns face.
The situation involving this Alabama mayor seems to be a product of a toxic combination: deeply rooted racism, a lack of accountability, and a self-serving system. The fact that the opposition didn’t even bother to field a candidate against him speaks volumes. It’s clear they didn’t recognize his legitimacy as a candidate. They were so entrenched in their views that they chose to disregard the will of the people rather than engage in a fair contest. It’s a clear example of how force, or in this case, the threat of force or exclusion, can undermine democracy.
The story also highlights the broader systemic issues that plague the United States, particularly in the South. The deep-seated racism, and the unwillingness of some to confront it, are disheartening reminders of the work that still needs to be done. It’s an issue which, tragically, remains a relevant conversation.
It’s tough to avoid the feeling that these types of problems arise because the people involved don’t face consequences for their actions. It creates an environment where prejudice and discrimination are tolerated. The story serves as a reminder that, in the fight against discrimination, it’s vital to focus on systemic change, challenge power structures, and ensure that those who abuse their power are held accountable.
This whole situation serves as a call to action. It underscores the importance of vigilance, the need for reforms, and the imperative to challenge any form of injustice. It also reflects the need for a new, more modern constitution that makes sure that the interests of all people are heard, not just the rich, influential, and hate-fueled. The mayor’s victory, though hard-won, must be seen as a significant triumph in the face of adversity. And the story of the mayor is proof that change, however slow, can be achieved.