By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Zelenskyy suggested that Russian attacks have decreased significantly since the arrival of Keith Kellogg, the US Special Envoy for Ukraine. According to Zelenskyy, there were no massive bombings for two nights following Kellogg’s arrival, which some Ukrainians found noteworthy. This observation led Zelenskyy to believe that Putin is intimidated by the presence of the US, as the attacks seem to have ceased when Americans were present. He humorously suggested that Kellogg should remain in Ukraine and that more Americans should visit.
Read the original article here
Zelenskyy’s approach, let’s be honest, is a calculated dance of flattery. It seems the headlines are crafted with a specific audience in mind: those who appreciate feeling important and powerful. It’s all about finding the angle, the key that unlocks the door to influence. In this case, it seems like Zelenskyy is effectively using this technique with the US, and specifically with the former President, Donald Trump.
The core message is that, since the arrival of Trump’s envoy, Kellogg, Ukraine hasn’t experienced heavy attacks for two nights. It’s a statement designed to resonate, to make someone feel like they’re having a tangible impact on the situation. It’s playing to the ego, and frankly, it might just be working. The strategy is simple: Tell the person what they want to hear, make them feel like they’re the one in control, and maybe, just maybe, it will get them to act in your favor.
The question of whether this strategy is appropriate is interesting. Some might view it as a necessary evil, a manipulation, or even a cynical ploy. But, others might see it as a pragmatic approach to getting what you need to survive. In a high-stakes situation like this, where the future of a nation is on the line, you can’t afford to be bound by strict ideals of honor and high principles. As long as it is ultimately effective, that is what matters.
One crucial element in understanding the situation is the fear Putin might have of the US. The US, with its military power, is the only country that Russia truly fears. Putin understands the consequences of directly provoking the US. It’s a delicate balance, but it seems the goal is to keep Russia in check with the constant threat of the US.
The arrival of the envoy, Kellogg, and the immediate decrease in attacks raise some questions. Coincidence? Or is there a real correlation? Maybe Putin is taking a pause, gauging the situation, or heeding some kind of unspoken communication.
This situation has some interesting parallels with the idea of “dangling a treat in the doorway”. It’s about managing expectations, providing incentives, and using a little bit of psychology to encourage desired behavior. Ukraine is asking for support, and they are saying and doing what is necessary to get it. This approach of flattery and making others feel powerful, is being used by Ukraine and NATO, and, in general, it seems to be working.
Of course, there’s a risk involved. Putin is known for favoring intimidation, but he can be tempted by flattery. Russia has a habit of making indiscriminate attacks and justifying them with misinformation. And the US has its own history of both strength and flaws when it comes to involvement in global conflicts. It also raises the question of what the US is looking to gain from this situation, because it’s always a two-way street.
Let’s not forget about the real people involved. The fact that there are no heavy attacks for two nights, is great news for the civilians, and children that are caught in the middle of this conflict.
The underlying theme of the article is about the need for practicality and the willingness to use whatever means necessary to achieve a goal. The “whatever works” principle is the guiding idea.