By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev spoke by phone on July 1st. During their call, Zelenskyy expressed gratitude for Azerbaijan’s support for Ukraine and its territorial integrity. Zelenskyy also offered condolences for the killing of Azerbaijani nationals on Russian territory and voiced support for Azerbaijan amid recent tensions. Finally, the leaders discussed bilateral relations and agreed to hold a meeting on economic cooperation.
Read the original article here
Zelenskyy backs Azerbaijani President Aliyev amid Azerbaijan–Russia tensions, and it’s a fascinating development that speaks volumes about the shifting sands of geopolitical alliances. Considering the current climate, with the backdrop of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the complex relationships in the Caucasus region, this backing is anything but a simple gesture. It’s a move that reflects strategic thinking, understanding of shared interests, and perhaps, a bit of defiance toward Russia.
The support is particularly significant when you consider that Azerbaijan is now facing a delicate situation, navigating tensions with both Russia and Iran. This situation brings into sharp relief the intricate web of alliances and animosities that define this part of the world. Iran’s accusations of Azerbaijani support for Israel, amidst the ongoing conflict, add another layer of complexity. Azerbaijan and Israel have a strong alliance, which adds an element of intrigue to the broader geopolitical landscape. This is where Zelenskyy’s support for Aliyev takes center stage.
Considering the strategic implications, the possibility of Azerbaijan and Georgia forming a second front into Russia is quite a provocative notion. It highlights the potential for regional powers to reshape the balance of power, and it’s a scenario that could significantly impact the dynamics of the conflict. The idea of Ukrainian drones attacking Russian targets near the Azerbaijani border is intriguing. It is worth noting that any such actions should be considered from a perspective that acknowledges Azerbaijan’s sovereign right to determine its own alliances and its own course of action.
Looking at the broader picture, it’s hard not to see the potential for a new alignment of countries that find themselves under existential threat. The possible axis, as mentioned, featuring Israel, Ukraine, South Korea, and Taiwan, is an interesting concept. This development signifies a departure from the status quo and hints at a future where smaller nations could play a significant role in global affairs.
Adding to the complexities, Iran’s relationship with Armenia and the historical dynamics are a factor. Understanding the nuances of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh is also necessary to provide full context. Both Azerbaijan and Ukraine have publicly supported each other’s territorial claims, rooted in the principle of retaining post-Soviet territorial boundaries.
Considering the Russia-Iran relationship, the dynamics are more complicated than they might appear at first glance. Despite some shared interests, there’s a historical tension and a degree of mistrust between the two. Russia has not always acted in Iran’s best interests.
The fall of the Assad regime in Syria created a new dynamic. Israel, which had previously avoided directly clashing with Russia, is now free to align more firmly against it, especially if Syria ends up with a government that is either friendly with the West or at least not aligned with Russia. The interwoven relationship between Israel and Russia due to its substantial connections should not be ignored.
The entire scenario is ripe with potential for instability. Considering the potential for provocations and false flag operations, the region could quickly escalate in complexity. Ukraine’s role in potentially facilitating negotiations between Israel and Syria could provide an interesting development.