By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent BBC documentary, Ukrainian President Zelenskyy characterized Vladimir Putin as a man devoid of emotion, viewing war as a detached job. Zelenskyy further emphasized Putin’s extensive deception, stating that the Russian leader considered the war his life. The documentary also features Boris Johnson’s recollection of a disconcerting phone call with Putin prior to the invasion, where Putin made eerie remarks and denied any intentions of invading Ukraine.
Read the original article here
Zelenskyy on Putin: He is not human in terms of humanity.
It’s hard to avoid the stark assessment that Zelenskyy offers about Putin. The words cut deep, painting a picture of a man devoid of the empathy that defines our shared human experience. “Not human in terms of humanity” isn’t just a condemnation; it’s a chilling observation, a clinical assessment of a leader seemingly disconnected from the suffering he inflicts. It’s a phrase that lingers, forcing us to confront the reality of a man who, in Zelenskyy’s view, operates without the basic moral compass most of us take for granted.
Zelenskyy’s comparison to a killer, someone who simply “does their job” without emotion, drives the point home. This isn’t about anger or hatred; it’s about a perceived coldness, a calculated ruthlessness that transcends personal feelings. It suggests a detachment from the human cost of the war, a willingness to sacrifice lives as if they were expendable resources. This perception aligns with reports of attacks on hospitals and civilian targets, acts that seem to defy any basic understanding of human decency and international laws of war.
For him this war is his life.
This point, that “for him this war is his life,” amplifies the chilling assessment. If the war isn’t just a political objective but the very essence of Putin’s existence, then every action, every decision, is colored by that singular focus. This isn’t just a leader pursuing a strategic goal; it’s a man whose identity is intrinsically tied to the conflict. This also implies that the idea of backing down, of compromise, is almost impossible. It becomes a matter of personal survival, a testament to his legacy.
The implication here is terrifying: the war is not a phase, a policy, or a strategic blunder to be rectified. It is the entirety of Putin’s being. He seems to be so committed to the conflict that it may be a long-term game to get the outcomes that he wants. He is in it for the long haul, which also explains the many long-term plays that have taken place.
Zelenskyy’s words also illuminate the potential for a protracted conflict. If Putin’s identity and purpose are bound to the war, then a quick resolution becomes less likely. The only options will be to lose or to gain complete control. This raises a troubling possibility: the war could extend for years, potentially causing even more destruction and suffering, until it becomes an unescapable outcome.
The world watches, waiting for peace and an end to the war.
This reality is underscored by the economic realities, and the ongoing loss of life. The potential for the war to drag on, with no end in sight, becomes a significant concern. The world waits for a resolution, one way or another.
The world needs to confront the legacy of what’s happening, and the historical weight that comes with it. Putin’s actions will be judged by history, and his place alongside the likes of Hitler and Stalin is a reflection of the magnitude of this conflict.
Ultimately, Zelenskyy’s words offer a glimpse into the mind of a man driving one of the most devastating conflicts of our time. They compel us to contemplate the true nature of leadership and the potential consequences when a person’s identity is inextricably linked to conflict and war. The future is uncertain, but one thing is clear: the world will continue to grapple with the implications of Putin’s actions for a very long time to come.