By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent interview, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy revealed discussions with former US President Donald Trump regarding a potential deal involving the exchange of military technology. The proposal centers on Kyiv purchasing American weapons while simultaneously selling Ukrainian drone technology to the US. Zelenskyy believes this arrangement, which could be a “mega deal,” would be mutually beneficial, offering advantages to both nations. This initiative follows Trump’s earlier announcement of US arms funding for Ukraine by European allies and the planned delivery of Patriot air defense systems, although specifics remain uncertain.
Read the original article here
Zelenskyy says he is discussing “mega deal” on arms sales with Trump. It’s intriguing, isn’t it, how quickly language can shift to accommodate a certain style? Zelenskyy, it seems, is picking up on the Trumpian flair, adopting phrases like “mega deal.” While it might sound a bit… elementary, it’s hard to deny the potential impact of this direct approach. It’s clear the goal here is to get Trump’s attention and, more importantly, his approval for significant arms sales.
The motivations are multi-faceted. Trump, as we know, is keen on promoting the American military-industrial complex, and selling weapons to a country at war is a straightforward path to bolstering those interests. For Zelenskyy, securing these weapons is a matter of survival, and aligning with Trump offers a strategic advantage. There is a bit of a pattern here: it has become clear that slow-rolling aid and then accelerating it right when needed has been the pattern with the current administration.
It’s impossible not to think about why this wasn’t on the table from the start. Perhaps there were initial hesitations, or perhaps the political calculus was different. Maybe Trump was trying to leverage the situation, or maybe, as some suggest, he was genuinely misinformed about Putin’s intentions. Either way, it seems we’ve arrived at a point where a substantial arms deal is being seriously considered.
Of course, there are layers of cynicism to wade through. The phrase “mega deal” itself feels like a calculated move, designed to appeal to Trump’s sensibilities. The speed at which this has come to fruition is suspicious, but at the same time, it is hard to say that a deal is not the right thing to do. Is this solely a matter of strategic maneuvering and political posturing?
It’s natural to speculate about the underlying reasons. Could this be a genuine shift in strategy, or is it more of a public relations exercise? It would not be hard to imagine the political benefits of being the one who “solves” the war in Ukraine, or getting the right optics at the right time. There are also other options at play: if the claim of Putin having something on Trump is true, it will be hard to see a clear picture of this unfolding.
Of course, this deal would have to happen quickly. Anyone who has followed Trump knows how quickly his focus can shift. Agreements made today might not be valid tomorrow. There is also the question of whether Europe, and others, were even consulted about such a deal. An interesting question to ask is: does a deal undercut any suggestion that Trump has some allegiances to Russia? This would be an important change to make.
Ultimately, it’s the substance of the deal that matters. What weapons are on the table? What are the terms? And, most importantly, will these arms reach Ukraine in a timely manner? It would be very interesting to see.