By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Volodymyr Zelensky has announced plans for Ukraine to sell drones to the United States, with a contract currently being drafted. The potential deal, discussed with President Donald Trump, could be worth between $10 and $30 billion. Zelensky has tasked key officials with preparing the agreement, highlighting the importance of the sale. This comes as drones have become increasingly critical in the Ukraine-Russia war, transforming modern combat.
Read the original article here
Zelensky Hopes US Will Buy Up to $30 Billion Worth of Ukrainian Drones
It seems there’s a potential deal brewing, with Ukraine’s President Zelensky aiming to secure a significant contract with the United States. The focus? Drones. The scale? Potentially up to $30 billion worth. This is a substantial amount, sparking a flurry of discussions about the implications of such an agreement.
One of the core arguments in favor of this deal centers on the practical battlefield experience Ukraine has gained. The war has forced them to become experts in drone warfare, utilizing both high-tech models and cost-effective, improvised ones. The US, as a key ally, could significantly benefit from this knowledge. It’s a chance to learn from their operational insights, understand the strengths and weaknesses of various drone types in real-world combat scenarios, and prepare for future conflicts where drones are poised to play an even more critical role. The expertise developed in Ukraine could be instrumental in preparing the US for modern warfare.
The current conflict has highlighted a crucial shift in modern warfare. The high-tech, expensive drones are becoming less effective, while lower-cost, mass-produced drones are proving to be game-changers. The Ukrainians, with their focus on adaptability, are on track to produce and use millions of these drones annually. The potential for the US to tap into this production capacity, moving away from reliance on foreign, particularly Chinese, drone imports, could offer a strategic advantage. Ukraine could potentially supply a massive quantity of drones to address various tactical needs.
The economics of this are worth considering. The cost-effectiveness of these drones is undeniable. One can imagine a scenario where conventional weapons, like expensive missiles, could be replaced by a swarm of lower-cost drones for similar objectives. The value proposition becomes even more compelling when considering that the US, with its existing infrastructure, could also boost its own drone manufacturing.
Of course, there are also questions about the specific types of drones and their applications. The potential for these drones to be used in various roles, including civilian surveillance, raises ethical concerns. Furthermore, it’s recognized that any technology can be used against governments, not just by them. The US already faces the challenge of domestic issues, and such a move might raise those concerns.
One significant factor is the changing landscape of air warfare. While the US currently boasts a significant advantage in high-tech drone technology, the evolving nature of warfare necessitates adaptation. Anti-drone technologies are likely to be a key investment area. In the face of a swarm of drones, the traditional air superiority enjoyed by the US could be challenged. This shifts the focus toward defensive strategies.
The core idea that comes through is the growing recognition that the US needs to be prepared for modern, adaptable warfare. The conventional model of expensive military equipment may not always be the most effective strategy. The unique experience that Ukraine has in drone warfare is what makes this deal an attractive proposition.
However, skepticism is also warranted. This deal, if it goes through, would involve a large-scale financial commitment, and it’s crucial to ensure transparency and accountability. Is there a need to support Ukraine? Of course. But at what cost?
There are also questions around the viability of mass-producing these kinds of drones in the US. Some commentators suggest that the US already has the capacity to produce such drones itself, making large-scale purchases from Ukraine unnecessary. This raises the question: Is it more about supporting an ally, or is there an underlying strategic advantage that the US is after?
The fact that European investors haven’t invested more than $3 million in Ukrainian defense companies suggests that the kind of warfare Ukraine is engaged in is not that attractive as an economic opportunity.