By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A Harvard polling expert suggests that young men, particularly those aged 18-29, who were instrumental in Donald Trump’s election are now disillusioned with his performance. This shift in sentiment is attributed to economic concerns and the perception that Trump has not delivered on his campaign promises. Della Volpe’s research indicates that Trump’s approval ratings among young people are in the 30s, with many struggling financially. The report indicates that young voters are seeking economic stability, and may not be drawn to Trump’s “macho persona” as they once were.
Read the original article here
Young men who elected Trump just realized they screwed up – or so the headlines would have you believe. The reality, according to the lived experiences reflected here, seems to be a far cry from the narrative of widespread regret. The overwhelming sentiment gathered from these observations paints a picture of unwavering support, an entrenched loyalty that transcends the consequences of their choice. The collective impression from the anecdotes is that these individuals aren’t just sticking with their decision; they’re doubling down, clinging to their convictions with a tenacity that defies both logic and reason.
The assertion that many of these young men have finally had an “epiphany” about their choices is largely dismissed. Instead, there’s a consistent observation of unwavering devotion, even in the face of perceived failures. This suggests a deep-seated resistance to admitting a mistake, a reluctance to question the foundation upon which their initial support was built. The idea of regret seems almost alien to this group, as the responses are almost universally cynical, disbelieving the claims of any shift in sentiment.
The experiences shared indicate that many of these voters have become entrenched in their political identities. Their support seems to be more about defiance than conviction, a reaction against the establishment, the left, and anyone who doesn’t share their worldview. This sense of opposition, coupled with an unwillingness to admit error, creates a potent barrier against any shift in allegiance. Rather than feeling remorse, many appear to be actively engaged in defending their choice, reinforcing their commitment to the former president.
Many of the observations suggest that the desire to “own the libs” is a motivating factor. Their support is less about policy and more about the symbolic act of supporting someone who opposes the status quo. This underlying current of spite and defiance makes it difficult, if not impossible, to convince this demographic to change their minds. It’s not about the results, it’s about the act of supporting.
There is a very real sense that some young voters who supported the former president are not capable of the introspection necessary to process any regret, whether it’s a lack of the critical thinking, or a deeply entrenched belief system. It may be an unwillingness to admit they were wrong, or a fear of challenging the social circles they inhabit. Whatever the reason, the conclusion is the same: no buyer’s remorse.
Furthermore, some of the individuals mentioned are convinced they will continue to support this political figure, or at least his ideology. Their commitment is presented as unwavering, suggesting that any future consequences will be rationalized and attributed to other factors. In the eyes of these voters, the former president can do no wrong, and any criticism is seen as a personal attack.
The anecdotes shared highlight the prevalence of this unwavering support. The people described appear to be impervious to the effects of his policies or any criticisms leveled against him. This indicates a disconnect between the reality on the ground and the perceptions of this voting bloc. It suggests that they are insulated from the consequences of their choices, or perhaps, that they are unwilling to acknowledge them.
It’s worth noting that the people described do not seem to recognize the negative impact of what they did in the voting booth, regardless of what results are on display. The consequences are attributed to other sources, or, if acknowledged, are framed as a necessary evil in the fight against the forces they perceive as threatening their way of life.
Instead of regret, the prevailing attitude seems to be one of steadfast commitment. The reports show a resistance to any hint of contrition or change of heart. Many in this demographic seem to believe the narrative that is often sold to them, that the mainstream media is lying, and the only true source of information is the political figure they support.
In conclusion, the collective observations paint a picture of a voting bloc that is firmly entrenched in its support for the former president. The idea of any kind of regret, let alone a widespread “realization” of wrongdoing, is largely dismissed. Instead, the dominant feeling is one of steadfast conviction, fueled by defiance and a resistance to accepting any blame for the outcome.