By John Q. Hosedrinker 
World Athletics has implemented a new policy requiring athletes to pass a one-time gene test to compete in the female category at world-ranking competitions. This test for the SRY gene, which can be conducted through a cheek swab or blood test, will be overseen by member federations and is meant to ensure that only biologically female athletes compete. This rule comes into effect on September 1st, aiming to create a level playing field, as gender cannot trump biology. This follows years of debate over eligibility criteria, with the new regulations addressing concerns about biological advantages and building on recommendations made by a working group.
Read the original article here
World Athletics mandates gene tests for female category eligibility. It’s a story that feels like a rehash of history, a policy that’s been tried before, only to be abandoned due to controversies and the inevitable false positives that arise. And now, here we are again, with the stated goal of ensuring fairness and maybe, just maybe, preventing any perceived advantages.
The concern appears to be about protecting cisgender female athletes, but the reality is much more complex. Some are predicting that many people are about to discover just how common genetic variations are, challenging the idea of a clear-cut division between male and female. It is hard to keep this simple.
A good starting point might be to recognize the complexity of human biology and biochemistry. The focus should be on the athlete’s lived experience and history. Has this person genuinely undergone a transition? Do they have a history of identifying and living as the other gender? It seems reasonable to consider these factors, but there also is a concern that the new rules might simply make life even harder for vulnerable people.
This whole thing feels like another attempt to focus on trans women, even though the issue is more complicated than that. If these tests are going to be done, why not test *every* participant? This could eliminate the risk of targeted testing, where someone is singled out because they don’t “look feminine enough.” It would create a more even playing field.
The underlying motivations for these tests are likely tied to broader societal anxieties and biases. There’s the concern that these rules are, in some way, an attempt to undermine the progress women have made in sports. Some believe the real goal is to push women out of sports and reinforce outdated gender roles.
Some propose that the answer is to test for things like testosterone levels or muscle fiber types and create different categories based on those metrics, similar to weight classes in other sports. While it’s crucial to ensure fairness and the integrity of elite competition, it’s also essential to recognize that no one transitions genders for the primary purpose of gaining an advantage in sports.
The debate around this is about more than just the science. It’s about identity, fairness, inclusion, and the very nature of sport. Should we be limiting participation at the highest level? Absolutely everyone should be able to participate and enjoy sport at an appropriate level. It is about respecting people’s identities. Some might even argue that if the primary concern is fair play, the focus should be on factors like testosterone levels or muscle fiber types instead of gender identity.
It’s vital to acknowledge that there’s no easy answer. It’s a complex issue with deep implications, and the decision to implement these tests isn’t a simple one. How do we ensure that we’re not excluding people from sports unnecessarily?
There’s a lot of frustration about trans women being asked to “prove” their womanhood. It’s as if the concern is to make sure women are women and men are men. But it’s not about that. Women are just people, and men are just people. Trans men don’t seem to be demanding to compete in men’s events. The criticism is about cis women being asked to move aside for trans women. The world mistreats women, especially trans women. The idea that someone would go through all the mistreatment just to win a sport is preposterous.
There is the suggestion that the motivation is to stop trans women from competing. The argument is that there is no real problem because trans women aren’t dominating women’s sports.
It’s crucial to be aware that these genetic variations are far more common than most realize. People can have XX chromosomes and develop as males, or XY chromosomes and develop as females. These are rare occurrences, but not uncommon in elite sport. The concern is not actually about trans women, but about biological variations in women that could lead to an advantage. The challenge is that you will see more of these genetic abnormalities at the elite level.
This whole idea to ban female athletes based on genetics has also been around for a while. It went away for a reason, but there is a chance it is being implemented again. This policy is about pushing women and girls out of sports.