By John Q. Hosedrinker 
This report details the Vatican’s practice of sending thousands of Italian children born to unwed mothers to America under the guise of orphan visas during the mid-20th century. Many of these children were not orphans, and their mothers, often pressured or misled by the Church, were unaware of their children’s adoptions. The Church, driven by financial gain and demand from American Catholic families, sometimes even told mothers their children had died. This resulted in the pain and separation of families, as many adoptees later struggled to reunite with their birth mothers, some of whom are still dealing with the aftereffects of the program.
Read the original article here
Vatican sent Italian children born out of wedlock to America as orphans; new book uncovers program, and it’s a story that, frankly, just makes you shake your head. We’re talking about a hidden program, a carefully orchestrated series of events that ripped children away from their mothers in Italy and sent them across the ocean, primarily to America. It’s hard to fathom the sheer scale of it, how many lives were impacted, and the lasting trauma it must have caused. The core of the story, as I understand it, centers on the Church’s role in facilitating this, operating in the shadows to separate families.
The prevailing sentiment seems to be that the Church acted as more than just a facilitator; the implication is that it was actively involved in, if not directly orchestrating, this program. The narrative suggests that the practice was widespread, not just confined to Italy, with similar schemes happening in places like Ireland and even further afield, with different aims. The idea is that in the Italian context, the goal was to “clean up” and protect reputations. The practice was not in line with the teachings of Christ. The program wasn’t about saving children; it was about controlling women’s bodies and their sexuality, punishing them for societal transgressions and protecting the Church’s public image.
It seems the process often started with a young, unwed woman. The traditional narrative would see the woman quietly shipped to a community in the United States, particularly one with a strong Italian heritage. There, she would give birth, and the child would be informally “adopted” by relatives, providing a new family. A local priest would create a baptismal certificate that served as a makeshift birth certificate, making the child seem legitimate. Following this, the mother, presumably heartbroken, would be sent back to Italy. The expectation was that she would simply return to her previous life, as though nothing had happened.
The Church’s actions are especially disheartening when considering the core tenets of Christian teaching. The message of forgiveness and acceptance that Jesus preached seemed to be conveniently forgotten in this case. There’s a sense of hypocrisy here, a stark contrast between the proclaimed ideals and the actual practices. Some of the actions by the Church appear barbaric. It’s hard to reconcile this with the teachings of love and compassion that the Church claims to represent.
The implications of this program are far-reaching. It raises questions about the ethics of adoption, the power of religious institutions, and the historical treatment of women and those born out of wedlock. It touches on the painful legacy of shame and secrecy, and the lengths to which institutions would go to protect their reputation at the expense of innocent lives. The echoes of this history can still be felt today, in the ongoing debates about adoption practices and the rights of adoptees to know their biological roots. This is something adoptees deserve.
The idea of forced abandonment and human trafficking keeps coming up. The fact that it’s being described in terms like “human trafficking” really drives home the severity of what happened. This wasn’t just about adoption; it was about exploitation and control, denying mothers the right to raise their children and children the right to know their origins. We have also seen in the article how these programs were not simply about the church, these programs were a form of oppression against women.
The fact that the Vatican might have profited from this further complicates the issue. It’s a harsh indictment of the institution that was supposed to provide solace and guidance, and that it was, in fact, complicit in acts that caused so much pain and suffering. The fact that there are similar practices in places like Spain, where mothers were allegedly told their babies were stillborn, shows how pervasive and insidious these schemes were.
The emotional toll on both the mothers and children is immense. The mothers were forced to give up their children, carrying the grief and regret for the rest of their lives. The children, growing up without knowledge of their origins, were robbed of a fundamental part of their identity. It’s a tragedy that spanned generations and left deep scars on countless families.