By John Q. Hosedrinker 
CNN commentator Van Jones believes the Trump administration is being dishonest about the Epstein files, arguing only a naive person would accept the claim that no significant information exists. Jones accused the administration of either lying previously about having damaging information or covering up the truth now. The commentator emphasized that either way, MAGA supporters have been misled. Even Republican strategist Shermichael Singleton agreed, noting that no one believes the official narrative and more transparency is needed.
Read the original article here
Van Jones: Only ‘Weapons-Grade’ Stupid People Believe There Are No More Epstein Files. The sentiment that only the profoundly ignorant could possibly believe the Epstein files saga is over seems to be gaining traction. The consensus seems to be that the narrative of the Epstein case is far from finished, and the belief that all relevant information has been released is, to put it mildly, naive. It’s a concept that seems to be resonating, and the phrase “weapons-grade stupid” is being thrown around to describe those who deny the existence of more files.
The idea that the most frequent, or even any, customer of Epstein’s wasn’t associated with the former president is a tough pill to swallow for many. The historical context and the association with Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s residence, raises obvious questions that need to be answered. The image of Trump and his connections to the Epstein affair are hard to avoid and impossible to dismiss. The fact that the former president himself has made statements denying involvement and/or “not remembering” certain interactions only fuels the suspicion. It’s almost as if the phrase “I don’t recall, we barely met!” is a familiar refrain in a carefully constructed narrative.
The idea of a systematic cover-up is also prominent. Some feel that the shift in the conservative media’s coverage and the subsequent silence from key figures suggest an attempt to sweep the issue under the rug. The use of the term “MAGATS” is prevalent when describing those who seemingly reject the presented evidence. It becomes clear that this isn’t just about ignorance; it’s about actively choosing to ignore the evidence of one’s own eyes. The existence of photographs and details about “the island of sin” is a stark reminder of the environment of abuse. This is not mere stupidity but complicity.
The consensus indicates a deeply rooted belief in hidden truths. The release of new documents and the ongoing investigation into Epstein’s network fuel the idea that there’s a lot more to uncover. Despite Jones’s history, some are happy with his statements and the fact that more people are seeing the light, even though it’s an unlikely source. The idea of the public deserving the truth is a common sentiment, and it’s becoming clear that this isn’t a partisan issue.
The comments seem to indicate that those who deny there are more files do so not out of a genuine belief in the lack of evidence, but as a form of denial or a means of protecting the individuals implicated. The “weapons-grade stupid” phrase is used not simply to describe a lack of intelligence, but to pinpoint a specific choice to ignore reality for the sake of loyalty or political alignment. It’s a form of deliberate ignorance, a willful blindness to what is happening right in front of everyone.
The perspective seems to suggest that the real scandal isn’t just the trafficking itself, but the cover-up and the attempt to protect powerful figures. It’s about acknowledging the moral implications of the situation. The discussion also raises legitimate questions about the depth of the conspiracy and who might be implicated. The possibility of certain powerful figures erasing or destroying files is noted. It’s a reasonable fear, especially given the individuals who stand to lose the most from the release of further information.
The prevailing idea is that the situation is far worse than most people realize. The assertion is that the full extent of the Epstein affair is more horrific than the current public understanding. The claim seems to be that there is a deeply ingrained level of evil and that those who deny it, or support the people associated with it, are either deliberately misled or complicit. The suggestion is that the focus should be on identifying and exposing the people protecting the child rapists.