By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The United States, the world’s second-largest plastic producer, has declared its opposition to regulating the supply side of plastics in a new global treaty, advocating for country-level discretion. During an informal gathering in Nairobi, US officials stated their support for an agreement focused on reducing plastic pollution without halting plastic use, aligning with major fossil fuel producers. Despite “constructive” discussions, countries remain divided on key issues like plastic production, hindering progress toward a deal ahead of the final round of negotiations in Geneva. The US’s stance is seen as a potential obstacle to an ambitious treaty, with negotiators now focused on finding language to bring more countries onboard and encourage transparency without strict reduction targets.
Read the original article here
The US’s stance against limits on plastic production in the UN treaty talks is, frankly, a bit disheartening, but perhaps not entirely surprising. It’s a move that aligns with the interests of major plastic-producing nations, including China and India, and it’s a clear indication of where priorities lie. The fact that plastic production is predicted to triple in the coming decades, especially with rising demand in the developing world, makes this stance even more concerning. It raises a fundamental question: are we really prepared to grapple with the consequences of this ever-increasing plastic tide?
The US seems to be echoing some familiar refrains, almost sounding like the words of Russia in the past, which often signals trouble or outright deception. The reality is, the evidence is overwhelming that plastic is detrimental to the environment, and, by extension, our health. The lack of proper recycling and disposal infrastructure in both the US and elsewhere is a massive problem. We’re talking about mountains of non-biodegradable trash accumulating everywhere, and the rise of microplastics in our water and air, not to mention the fact that we’re literally ingesting them. These are not abstract concerns; they’re tangible and immediate threats.
The issue here is the economic drivers behind plastic production. Oil companies and related industries have reaped enormous profits for decades, and largely ignored the consequences. This isn’t a new story; it’s Big Oil operating as usual, prioritizing profits over responsibility. That’s why the UN treaty, which is lacking in enforcement power, seems like a mere suggestion. It’s all about who holds the power and the money, which unfortunately, often dictates the outcomes.
It almost feels like the US is stuck in a “drill baby drill” mentality. The domestic manufacturing push seems to be more about jobs and profits than public welfare. It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that the health and well-being of Americans aren’t the priority. Frankly, it’s not particularly surprising.
The perception of the US around the world has shifted dramatically. The US is no longer viewed as an ally in many corners of the world, but rather, an adversary. The US seems to be focused on its own growth, often at the expense of others.
The US’s disregard for the environment and public health is deeply concerning. It is an example of prioritizing profit over everything else. This approach is creating a scenario that threatens the future.
The issues surrounding plastic are complex, but the US’s current position sends a clear message. It’s a message that prioritizes profits and a narrow view of national interest over global cooperation and environmental well-being. It’s a position that many see as a betrayal of the global community.