By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In July 2022, Russian forces orchestrated a deadly attack on a correctional facility near Olenivka, resulting in the deaths of over 50 Ukrainian prisoners of war and injuries to approximately 130 others. Initially, Russia falsely accused Ukraine, claiming a HIMARS missile strike was responsible for the incident. However, a recent internal UN analysis concluded that Russia planned and executed the attack, identifying the weapons and ammunition used. Ukrainian Ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets believes the report should serve as a catalyst for further investigation into this war crime.
Read the original article here
UN experts confirm Olenivka attack in Ukraine was a deliberate Russian war crime, and this is a really significant development, even if it’s taken what feels like an eternity to get here. Three years, to be exact, for an investigation to conclude something that many people knew, suspected, or believed from the very beginning. It’s a stark reminder of the slow churn of international justice and the frustrating reality that even when wrongdoing is confirmed, holding those responsible can be incredibly difficult.
This whole situation highlights the agonizing process that survivors and the families of victims have had to endure. They’ve been through hell, seeking answers, a fair investigation, and ultimately, justice. To have the UN finally “squeak out the right thing in the end,” as someone put it, after all this time, feels almost insulting, even if it’s a crucial step in the right direction. It underlines the immense emotional toll this has taken and the inherent struggles involved in navigating international bodies and legal frameworks.
The reaction to this confirmation is a mix of relief, frustration, and skepticism, and honestly, that’s understandable. Many people, equipped with common sense, empathy, and a basic understanding of the atrocities that have unfolded, knew this was a deliberate act of violence from the start. Places like Bucha and Mariupol have become synonymous with the horrors of this conflict, and the Olenivka attack seems to fit squarely within the pattern of deliberate targeting and disregard for human life.
There’s also an inescapable sense of cynicism regarding the potential for consequences. The question of whether Vladimir Putin will be held accountable hangs heavy in the air. The UN’s role, in particular, is being scrutinized. Some see them as part of the problem due to the delays and perceived lack of impact. The fact that the UN’s structure, with its veto powers, can hinder justice is a point of frustration. This criticism is valid when you look at the power dynamics at play.
Now, it’s true that even though this report has been issued, whether meaningful action will follow is another matter entirely. The UN, for all its good intentions, is often hamstrung by political realities. The report itself is only a piece of the puzzle. There is an urgent need for proper accountability to make the verdict of guilt stick.
We can’t forget the victims. The Olenivka attack was a horrific event, and the fact that it’s now confirmed to be a war crime adds weight to the suffering experienced by those who died and their loved ones. Each piece of confirmed evidence helps to paint a more complete picture of the horrors Russia has committed, and of the systematic brutality being enacted. It is the hope that the report will lead to justice.
When discussing this, it is important to acknowledge the other horrors of this war. The forced mobilization of Donbas Ukrainians and the drone hunts targeting civilians, are amongst the many crimes Russia has committed, showing the systematic nature of their actions. This is not to diminish the significance of confirming that Olenivka was a war crime, but to acknowledge the larger context of the atrocities committed.
It’s worth noting that the confirmation comes despite significant obstruction by Russia. This makes the UN’s findings even more significant, because it indicates that despite attempts to conceal the truth, evidence pointing to a deliberate war crime has been gathered and confirmed. This is something really important, it gives credibility to the report itself.
Interestingly, the name Steven Seagal has popped up in connection with the Olenivka attack. Seagal, known for his action films, visited the prison where Ukrainian detainees were held just days after the attack. His presence and actions, including appearing in propaganda videos, have been widely criticized, and it’s worth remembering the kind of narrative some are trying to promote. His association with the event certainly raises further questions.
In conclusion, the UN experts’ confirmation of the Olenivka attack as a deliberate Russian war crime is a key development. While it’s a positive step, it is crucial to acknowledge the lengthy process, the emotional toll on those affected, and the lingering questions regarding accountability and consequences. The confirmation, despite Russian obstruction, is important and must be looked upon as an important development that should be used to seek further justice.