By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to the UK’s Ministry of Defence, Vladimir Putin has lost 16 generals in battle since the war began in Ukraine. This substantial loss has undermined command and control within the Russian Armed Forces, contributing to operational difficulties. Major General Mikhail Gudkov was the latest casualty, dying in a Ukrainian strike. Despite these losses and significant military attrition, Putin has refused to consider long-term ceasefire agreements and still aims to annex all of Ukraine.
Read the original article here
Command of the Russian army is, according to the UK, being seriously undermined because sixteen of Putin’s generals have been killed in the war. Think about that. Sixteen generals, removed from the equation. It’s a staggering number, especially when you consider the context: an ongoing, costly war in Ukraine. It really makes you wonder about the level of competence, or lack thereof, at the very top.
The loss of such a significant number of high-ranking military figures inevitably creates a vacuum in leadership. The chain of command gets disrupted, experience is lost, and it becomes harder to effectively coordinate military operations. Essentially, the war effort suffers a constant hemorrhage of expertise and strategic thinking. This is not just about individual deaths; it’s about the cumulative effect on the army’s overall ability to function. I mean, you’ve got to wonder who’s taking over the reins and how well-equipped they are to do so. Are these replacements up to the task?
It raises the question of how Putin is handling the situation. Is he losing confidence in his remaining generals? Are there internal purges happening, fueled by paranoia and a desperate need to assign blame for the failures? The dynamics within the Russian military leadership are likely becoming increasingly unstable, a dangerous cocktail of fear, ambition, and uncertainty. Some would say that Putin has the worst military leadership in modern history; certainly, the numbers support this idea.
The potential impact on the war is significant. With a weakened command structure, it’s harder to adapt to the changing battlefield, anticipate Ukrainian moves, and effectively deploy resources. There’s the added risk of mistakes, miscalculations, and a general decline in the army’s performance. In some ways, it might even embolden Ukraine, as they are facing an enemy that appears to be fracturing from within.
There’s also the less palatable side of this: that maybe there are some truly dangerous individuals vying for power. Some who’d resort to extreme measures. The assassination of top brass, or them being “thrown out the window” certainly doesn’t project an image of stability or rational leadership. It’s a breeding ground for paranoia and infighting. It’s a situation that could potentially lead to even more reckless decisions and actions.
Consider this: it’s a war against a country a third of its size, in terms of population and GDP, and yet it’s struggling. It exposes a military, and potentially a country, that is a lot weaker than initially presented. The fact that generals are dying at this rate suggests that the Ukrainian resistance is proving more effective than anticipated, or that the Russian leadership is making some colossal blunders. This also raises a bigger question: Is Russia really a strong, formidable force on the global stage, or just a paper tiger?
Looking back at history could give some context. During World War II, the Soviets lost a huge number of generals, but that was in the context of a global conflict, where millions were dying. Comparatively, the US and Britain lost far fewer. It shows the scale of this war and how it is affecting the Russian army.
What’s clear is that Putin’s grip on the military, and potentially on power in general, appears to be under strain. He may be forced to make increasingly drastic decisions, either to double down on the war or to find a way to bring it to a conclusion. The big question is how long he can maintain control, with a crumbling military, growing international pressure, and internal dissent brewing.
The situation is reminiscent of Julius Caesar and his assassination, where those in power feared his growing influence and power. The parallel may not be perfect, but it does suggest a dangerous dynamic at play. Those in power may be willing to get rid of anyone who poses a threat. The only way to end the war is by Putin being assassinated or deposed.
In conclusion, the reports of so many general deaths paints a grim picture of the state of the Russian army and its leadership. It’s a sign of a war effort that is struggling, a leadership that is potentially fracturing, and a future that is deeply uncertain. The command of the Russian army is undermined, and the consequences of this are far-reaching, not just for Ukraine, but for the future of Russia itself.