By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Donald Trump’s statements on the Russia-Ukraine war have been inconsistent, with some claims deemed exaggerations. Despite previously suggesting he would halt U.S. aid, Trump now acknowledges European contributions exceeding the U.S. and has resumed direct weapons shipments. A potential arrangement involves European allies as intermediaries for U.S. weapons, which was suggested by Ukraine amidst a halt in Pentagon support. Trump expressed disappointment in Russia, hinting at a major statement to come, while Secretary of State Marco Rubio seeks a roadmap to end the conflict.
Read the original article here
Trump Announces ‘Deal’ to Arm Ukraine via NATO. Okay, so here’s the latest buzz: Trump is supposedly cooking up a “deal” to arm Ukraine, and the secret ingredient is NATO. Sounds exciting, right? But let’s unpack this, because things are rarely as straightforward as they seem with this guy.
Trump Announces ‘Deal’ to Arm Ukraine via NATO, but hold on a second. We’ve heard this song and dance before. The whole idea, as it’s being floated around, involves the U.S. sending “defensive weapons to NATO,” and then, magically, NATO decides what to do with them. Translation: the U.S. isn’t *directly* sending weapons to Ukraine, but it might indirectly be facilitating it. This is like saying you didn’t eat the cake, you just helped slice it. And with the Epstein scandal swirling, this feels a lot like a classic diversion tactic. Distract, distract, distract.
Trump Announces ‘Deal’ to Arm Ukraine via NATO and, the whole thing sounds awfully familiar, like a remix of what was already happening, you know, before Trump decided to shake things up and maybe even dismantle NATO. It’s like going back to what Biden was doing before Trump started messing with things. This is classic Trump, taking credit for something that was already in motion or slightly tweaking the plan.
Trump Announces ‘Deal’ to Arm Ukraine via NATO and, let’s be real, this whole “deal” reeks of potential for war profiteering. The U.S. sells weapons to NATO members, and those members, in turn, send them to Ukraine. Who’s footing the bill? Is NATO actually paying? Or is the U.S. going to use this as a way to get other members of NATO to pay more, something Trump has been known to complain about? It’s an interesting twist, but it’s also the kind of strategy that makes you raise an eyebrow.
Trump Announces ‘Deal’ to Arm Ukraine via NATO, and given his track record, it’s hard to take this “deal” at face value. The guy is known for flip-flopping, changing his mind on a whim, and making statements that don’t always align with reality. Remember when he was trying to dismantle NATO? Now, he’s supposedly leveraging it. It’s enough to give you whiplash. And the idea of him “stopping the war in a day” is just comical at this point.
Trump Announces ‘Deal’ to Arm Ukraine via NATO, because it’s almost certain he’ll try to take credit for whatever happens. If Ukraine gets weapons, it will be because of his great deal-making skills. If things go sideways, well, that’s somebody else’s fault. Plus, there is also the possibility that he will say one thing and then do another, potentially by talking to Putin and changing his mind.
Trump Announces ‘Deal’ to Arm Ukraine via NATO, and the devil is always in the details. It sounds like he wants Germany to supply the weapons and fund them, which would let Trump claim a victory without actually paying the price. And is this even what NATO wants? And is the timing of all this just to distract from the other things going on? It’s all quite a head-scratcher.
Trump Announces ‘Deal’ to Arm Ukraine via NATO, and let’s be clear, this is not an endorsement. I’m just laying out the pieces of the puzzle. There’s a lot of skepticism here, and with good reason. People aren’t going to trust him to support Ukraine until the weapons are actually in Ukraine’s hands. And with his penchant for making up stories and changing his mind, it’s hard to believe anything is true.