By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Recent data reveals a significant escalation in US air strikes under the current administration. Since taking office, the current president has ordered 529 air strikes, nearly matching the previous administration’s total of 555 strikes over four years. This aggressive approach includes operations in Yemen and Somalia, exceeding the pace of the prior administration, and has opened a new front targeting Iran’s nuclear program. Experts note the increased intensity of these campaigns, indicating a shift towards a more rapid and less restrained military response.
Read the original article here
Revealed: Trump has launched as many air strikes in five months as Biden did in four years. This revelation is, frankly, staggering, and it immediately flips the script on the narratives we’ve been fed. Remember the claims of the “anti-war president?” The ones who voted for Trump, citing Obama and Biden as warmongers? Well, it seems like a whole lot of pearl-clutching was going on. The irony is thick, especially when you consider the historical context.
Trump’s actions echo with the same troubling pattern of a leader who appears to embrace conflict, rather than avoid it. His rhetoric frequently clashed with the actual realities of his actions. The numbers paint a clear picture, showcasing a dramatic escalation of military force. This isn’t just about statistics; it’s about the implications of such a shift in policy. The focus on drone strikes, the secrecy surrounding their use, and the disregard for transparency regarding casualties, particularly civilian ones, all point to a concerning trend.
Remember the criticism of Obama’s administration over drone strikes? The hypocrisy is astounding. The same voices that once condemned the previous administration’s use of such tactics now seem to have become eerily silent when the same actions, and indeed, more aggressive ones, are undertaken by their preferred leader. It’s a stark reminder of how political allegiances can cloud judgment and distort perceptions of reality.
Trump not only maintained but actually increased the use of drone strikes. Yet, his supporters seem to have turned a blind eye, failing to condemn the very actions they previously decried. This selective outrage underlines the dangers of blind loyalty and the erosion of critical thinking. Congress, recognizing the potential for unchecked interventionism, was compelled to intervene, enacting war powers resolutions to curb Trump’s ambitions.
His administration’s foreign policy decisions and actions contributed to the recent regional conflict between Israel and Iran. His departure from the JCPOA, his provocations in the Middle East, all these moves set the stage for this disastrous situation. He repeatedly claimed he never started any wars, which is simply not true when you look at his actions during his first term. From escalating conflicts in Afghanistan and Yemen to creating further tension in the Persian Gulf, the evidence is undeniable.
Furthermore, during his initial time in office, the U.S. was actively engaged in military conflicts in multiple theaters, resulting in the loss of American lives. His actions extended beyond military matters, into the realm of trade, diplomacy, and international relations. The trade wars, negotiations with terrorists, and a concerning relationship with Putin all added to the instability. These actions strained alliances, weakened American influence, and created a dangerous environment on the global stage.
Trump’s dealings with Russia, including the weakening of sanctions and abandonment of U.S. outposts in Syria, show a willingness to align with adversaries over allies. He repeatedly demonstrated a lack of respect for our own intelligence agencies, and his relationships with authoritarian leaders worldwide further legitimized their regimes. And let’s not forget his failure to broker peace deals and the numerous wars he promised to end on “day one” of his second administration, all of which escalated after his inauguration.
Then there’s his approach to the war in Ukraine, which, ironically, he has repeatedly used to criticize Biden. Trump has often called Putin’s invasion “savvy” and “genius,” echoing Kremlin propaganda. Before the war even started, Trump neglected to broker peace between Russia and Ukraine while Russian sponsored forces were waging war inside of Ukraine throughout the entirety of his presidency.
The administration’s foreign policy extends to domestic policies as well. His repeated implementation of travel bans and “Muslim bans” heightened tensions both domestically and abroad. Trump’s failure to achieve any significant peace in the Middle East and his controversial decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital are major foreign policy blunders.
The question becomes, how can one reconcile this reality with the narrative of an “anti-war” president? The numbers simply don’t lie. The actions speak for themselves. Trump’s policies, both domestic and foreign, directly contradict the image he cultivated during his campaigns.